Search for: "United States v. Grace"
Results 581 - 600
of 653
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2008, 8:07 am
Barker v. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 2:22 pm
The EAJA provided that a party prevailing against the United States could get attorney's fees unless the position of the United States was "substantially justified. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 8:01 am
Nicholas Burns, former undersecretary of state for political affairs; Abigail Golden-Vázquez, vice president and founding executive director of the Aspen Institute Latinos and Society Program; and Amb. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 4:00 am
” This chapter discusses the attacks on the rule of law by the President and some in his orbit, including: (i) the rule of law; (ii) criticisms of laws by the President; (iii) The Hatch Act; (iv) other examples of violations; (v) military law; and (vi) pardons. 12.2 Rule of Law The President of the United States takes an oath to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 6:40 am
Grace and Co. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure Group (IP… [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm
The $4 million civil penalty will be divided among the United States, Alabama and Iowa. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 11:26 am
In United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 2:00 am
In the world of television, networks have used the Nielsen rating system, since 1947, to measure audience size and composition of television programming in the United States. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 12:14 pm
Title V, Private Company Flexibility and Growth. [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 10:15 pm
§ 455 and Canons 3C(1) and 3D of the Code of Conduct for United States Judges. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 11:28 pm
Will government of the people, by the people and for the people perish from the United States? [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 4:05 pm
If you are (i) seriously interested in regularly writing for a blog of good standing and high standards, (ii) thick-skinned enough to cope with criticism from readers and colleagues, (iii) very competent in terms of literacy, (iv) closely enough involved in patent dispute resolution to have something to say on a frequent basis and (v) based in a major patent litigating jurisdiction other than the United Kingdom, please email Jeremy here (subject line "PatLit")… [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 7:30 am
As the Supreme Court said in 1895, in Coffin v. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 5:51 am
When the opportunity came to work in the nascent field of international legal studies, Leech jumped at the chance, becoming editor of the Restatement of the Foreign Relations Law of the United States (1965), an entirely new arrangement of legal subject matter as it related to U.S. foreign affairs. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 2:00 am
In the world of television, networks have used the Nielsen rating system, since 1947, to measure audience size and composition of television programming in the United States. [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 6:27 pm
So, let’s start at the very beginning: The statements in question do not implicate the Confrontation Clause of the United States Constitution. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 2:04 pm
”Redmon v. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 8:07 am
: (Spicy IP), Latin America: Merck Serono signs distribution agreement with Bristol-Myers Squibb for portfolio of established pharmaceutical brands in Latin America: (IP tango), US: Biotech industry growth to slow due to funding pressures and competition from biosimilars: (Managing Intellectual Property), US: House Commerce Committee posts responses to its questions on biogenerics; not surprisingly, the views run the gamut: (FDA Law Blog), US: Biosimilar debate heats up at BIO: (Managing… [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 4:24 am
United States, 232 U.S. 383 (1914), our jurisprudence lurched back and forth between imposing a categorical warrant requirement and looking to reasonableness alone. [read post]
