Search for: "United States v. Lee"
Results 581 - 600
of 2,289
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2010, 12:55 pm
Taito is the owner of United States Copyright Registration No. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 4:05 am
Ainsworth, Amicus Curiae Brief: Stormans, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 4:05 am
Proia, Freeing the Prop 8 Tape: Perry v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 12:00 pm
(Ilya Somin) I tend to agree with Eugene that today’s Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
7 May 2007, 3:29 am
In DYSTAR TEXTILFARBEN GMBH v. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 7:51 am
Similarly, in United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
Something similar has been happening to shareholder voting rights in the United States, though it has garnered much less attention. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
Something similar has been happening to shareholder voting rights in the United States, though it has garnered much less attention. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 2:17 pm
Thus, the District Court for the Southern District of New York followed the decision of Jewel v. [read post]
25 May 2022, 5:23 am
" United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2023, 12:22 pm
In July 2022, the American Bar Association weighed in on the internecine legal warfare between political activist attorneys and state bar associations this way: “In June 2018, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled in Janus v. [read post]
4 May 2007, 5:14 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 9:30 am
The band is well known in legal circles due to their battle with the United States Trademark Office with In Re Tam, which is now before the Supreme Court of the United States and known as Lee v. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 10:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 5:20 am
United States, the Court held that a provision of the federal bank fraud statute which makes it a crime to “knowingly execut[e] a scheme . . . to obtain” property owned by, or under the custody of, a bank “by means of false or fraudulent pretenses” does not require the government to prove that a defendant intended to defraud a financial institution. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 2:57 am
Plaintiffs received a promissory note stating that the $100,000 would be applied to the purchase price upon closing. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:04 am
United States, 597 F. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 7:41 pm
United Catalysts, Inc., 43 F. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 7:55 am
Lee, 470 U.S. 753 (1985) to balance the intrusion to the appellant’s personal interests, the societal need for effective law enforcement, and the state’s need for evidence. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 9:38 am
Superior Court (Johnson) considered the interplay between the United States Supreme Court’s 1963 decision in Brady v. [read post]
