Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 581 - 600
of 10,388
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2014, 5:03 pm
Stevens, supra quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 7:26 am
Specifically, Applicant submitted evidence showing, among other things, that: Applicant has used the phrase GUARANTEED RATE in connection with the recited mortgage services since at least as early as 2000; Applicant owns two registrations for GUARANTEED RATE AFFINITY for the same services, both of which issued with a claim of acquired distinctiveness for GUARANTEED RATE; Applicant spent more than $140 million promoting its services under the subject marks (primarily under the design… [read post]
1 May 2020, 2:04 pm
” Its members account for approximately 55-60% of total olive oil sales in the United States. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 8:13 am
Topek, LLC v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 8:20 am
Case date: 24 June 2022 Case number: No. 18-302 Court: Supreme Court of the United States A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 12:01 pm
Interplay Entertainment Corporation United States District Court, D. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 9:21 pm
United States (1944), which upheld the internment of over 100,000 Japanese-Americans during World War II. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 4:26 am
PepsiCo, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 4:42 pm
Price v. [read post]
6 May 2012, 10:25 am
,”—and calling for “destruction of the United States,” and “the destruction of the Jewish people. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 12:18 am
Not for Publication United States District Court, S.D. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 1:22 pm
Shira Perlmutter and The United States Copyright Office (1:22-cv-01564) (June 2, 2022). [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 11:23 am
V. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 8:04 am
Trial evidence supported the district court’s judgment, blocking registration of VAGISAN in the United States. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 1:59 pm
More recently Megaupload, the uber-famous peer-to-peer platform, was shut down in 2012 and the United States Department of Justice commenced criminal actions against its owners. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 5:16 am
While the plaintiff’s filing of an application to register the SULKA mark in the United States was “certainly relevant” to intent to market products in the United States, it had little bearing on his ability to expand his business to the United States (Selah v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 7:50 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 4:07 am
TMC obtained a concurrent use registration for the entire United States except for the state of Oklahoma. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 1:52 pm
As explained in the case of United Biscuits v Asda [1997] RPC 513, customers might be misled by the similarities of get-up, confusion has a broad interpretation and does not require an intention to deceive. [read post]
29 May 2019, 8:14 am
In Mission Product Holdings v. [read post]
