Search for: "United States v. Morales" Results 581 - 600 of 3,243
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2013, 8:03 am by Maya Angenot
Murgia, 427 U.S. 307 (1976), in which the United States Supreme Court upheld a state law setting a mandatory retirement age of 50 for police officers, deferring to the legitimate interest identified in the state’s pleadings. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 7:20 am by Matthew Campbell
Because the United States once tried to argue that American Indians were not “persons” under the law, amicus NCAI is compelled to refute these arguments. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:42 pm by J. Gordon Hylton
  In the United States, baseball has always been more than just a game. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 3:14 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which the Court is considering whether a Pennsylvania man can be held criminally liable for threatening statements he made on Facebook, dominated Court-related coverage and commentary. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 12:53 pm
"  Moral of the story: when you turn yourself in for murder in Miami, ask the officer to verify the charges before you are taken away.Judge Schlessinger denied the motion to suppress at trial, and he gets another notch in his belt courtesy of the 3rd DCA.And finally in State v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
In practice, UK freedom of speech rights are more constrained than, for example, in the United States, where even “hate speech” is generally protected under the First Amendment to the US Constitution (see Adam Wagner’s post on the Congressman Giffords shooting for more). [read post]
28 Mar 2009, 3:44 am by Sean Hayes
The article detailed the test used for time, place, and manner regulation of speech and assembly in the United States. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 9:10 am by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
Yesterday, we filed a friend-of-the-court brief in the Supreme Court in a case called United States Agency for International Development v. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 1:16 pm by Lorenzo d’Aubert, Eric Halliday
§ 1182(a)(6)(E), which provides that “[a]ny alien who at any time knowingly has encouraged, induced, assisted, abetted, or aided any other alien to enter or to try to enter the United States in violation of law is inadmissible. [read post]