Search for: "Walker v. United States" Results 581 - 600 of 1,118
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2011, 6:06 pm by Law Lady
 Billing Fraud: VIRGINIA FEDERAL JUDGE WON'T DISMISS MEDICARE FRAUD DEFENDANTS, United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 1:53 pm by Richard Renner
United States District Court, Middle District of Georgia, Athens Division. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 5:09 pm by Lyle Denniston
  It thus became the third federal appeals court to reach that result; so far, no federal court at that level has upheld a ban in the wake of last year’s Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 6:07 pm by David R. Papke
Normet, 405 U.S. 56, 74 (1972), that no fundamental right to housing exists under the United States Constitution. [read post]
3 Aug 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Did the Constitution create a national government by “the people of the United States,” or a confederative “compact” of the states (Passim, but especially chapters 1 and 5)? [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 2:14 pm
Depending on how those proceedings turn out, we could have either (a) a Ninth Circuit opinion -- whether by three judges or by the Court en banc, it does not matter -- laying down the law for the entire Ninth Circuit on same-sex marriages, or (b) a Supreme Court decision doing the same for the entire United States. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 12:33 pm by Lovechilde
” Today, the United States Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit upheld Judge Walker's ruling. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 10:35 pm
Fitschen, Laying Low the High Flying Evangelicals at the United States Air Force Academy? [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 8:37 am
” So said Lord Walker last week in delivering the judgment of the United Kingdom Supreme Court in Progress Property v Moorgarth. [read post]
30 Aug 2009, 3:43 am
" They cite to a "famous footnote in a 1938 Supreme Court case" - footnote four of United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 5:41 am by Susan Brenner
” As Wikipedia also notes, defamation law in the United States “is much less plaintiff-friendly than its counterparts in European and the Commonwealth countries”, due to the influence of the 1st Amendment. [read post]