Search for: "Wife, P. v. Husband, P." Results 581 - 600 of 702
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2010, 8:03 am by Sam Hasler
Because wife contended that husband was not the biological father of J.R., there was a dispute as to whether J.R. was a child of the marriage. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 11:04 am by nyinjuries
  Once inside the apartment, Latanya Benson telephoned the police, while her husband, plaintiff, Kareem Benson, waited in his vehicle for her. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 8:29 am
This appears for example at paragraph 67 of the judgment of Sir Mark Potter P in Charman v Charman [2007] 1 FLR 1246 (Charman (No 4)) where he says:“… the starting point of every inquiry in an application of ancillary relief is the financial position of the parties. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 9:29 am by Rosalind English
A person who discriminated on the ground of race, as defined by the Act, could not pray in aid the fact that the ground of discrimination was one mandated by religion (R v Birmingham City Council Ex p Equal Opportunities Commission (No1) (1989) AC 1155 HL and James v Eastleigh BC (1990) 2 AC 751 HL). [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 8:35 am by admin
In Ramberg spousal support or alimony of $2,500 a month was set while the husband made approximately $11,250 a month and wife made approximately $1,250 a month and wife had custody of the two minor children of the parties. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 6:25 am by Susan Brenner
Miles, 211 Ariz. 475, 123 P.3d 669 (Arizona Court of Appeals 2005). [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 7:54 am by Jason Byrne
On December 29, 2009, the Court of Appeals published its opinion in Skelly v. [read post]
27 Dec 2009, 7:36 pm
In their culture, a wronged husband could kill his wife’s lover if he found the lover and his wife engaging in adulterous acts. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 9:47 am by Dave
That proposition was effectively trumped by Terry Gallivan, Counsel for Islington, who relied on the contrary proposition in Akinbolu v Hackney LBC (1997) 29 HLR 259, 269 as well as that old chestnut R v Sec of State for the Environment ex p Tower Hamlets LBC [1993] QB 632, 643, neither of which had been cited to Collins J. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 9:47 am by Dave
That proposition was effectively trumped by Terry Gallivan, Counsel for Islington, who relied on the contrary proposition in Akinbolu v Hackney LBC (1997) 29 HLR 259, 269 as well as that old chestnut R v Sec of State for the Environment ex p Tower Hamlets LBC [1993] QB 632, 643, neither of which had been cited to Collins J. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 10:08 am
On December 8, 2009, the Court of Appeals published its opinion in Helms v. [read post]