Search for: "Williamson v. State"
Results 581 - 600
of 849
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2011, 2:46 pm
Plaintiffs can indeed challenge government regulations as Takings — but they must do so as an as-applied challenge, which means that they must go to state court first, as Williamson County and San Remo Hotel held, with the claim- and issue-preclusion effects of prior state court judgments. [read post]
9 May 2021, 9:08 pm
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 10:20 am
Hart Friends of the Kings River v. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 3:42 am
The first case today is Comcast v. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 6:36 am
Citing the two step ripeness test, established by the United States Supreme Court in County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 6:36 am
Citing the two step ripeness test, established by the United States Supreme Court in County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 3:58 am
Forest Service v. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 10:07 pm
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit decision in Severance v. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 9:58 am
See, e.g., Williamson v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 12:09 pm
”); Williamson v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 8:09 am
The state's highest criminal court has already voided Morton's conviction in the murder of his wife, Christine Morton, who was beaten to death while lying in bed in their southwestern Williamson County home. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 7:39 am
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm
In West Virginia v. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 11:35 am
Township of Scott, which overturned the court’s precedent on the issue of eminent domain in the state law context in Williamson County Regional Planning Comm’n v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 12:06 pm
Kereluik v. [read post]
15 May 2016, 10:26 pm
Cashman v Lane, 2016 WL 1305106 (D. [read post]
20 Sep 2012, 4:51 pm
Supreme Court case, United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 8:58 am
[Soto v. [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 7:10 am
Ferncliff Cemetery Association, Inc. v Town of Greenburgh, 2021 WL 31948 (2nd Cir CA 2/1/2021) [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 11:30 am
The Appellate Division affirmed the Supreme Court’s ruling, explaining that “Under FOIL, agency records are presumptively available for public inspection, without regard to the need or purpose of the applicant, unless the requested documents fall within one of the exemptions set forth in Public Officers Law §87(2)," citing Williamson v Fischer, 116 AD3d 1169, leave to appeal denied, 24 NY3d 904.The court said that "[e]xemptions are narrowly construed,… [read post]
