Search for: "In INTEREST OF FEW v. State"
Results 5981 - 6000
of 11,576
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2012, 9:57 pm
In contrast, campaign finance issues are much lower salience to the public, and are less likely to arouse the passion of interest groups and perhaps the ire of Congress. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 3:50 am
The story is that Associate Justice Harry Blackmun was given authorship of the 7-2 majority opinion in Roe v. [read post]
8 May 2008, 12:22 pm
This prescriber testimony was uncontroverted, so the defendant won, despite the state-law presumption.Odom v. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 2:22 pm
York & York v. [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 7:29 am
And originalism’s interest in historical evidence has often been overly selective. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 12:19 pm
But the drug was effective, and only a few people (twelve) ever encountered the risk. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 1:39 pm
Seattle Schools and Grutter v. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 7:04 pm
” Indeed, earlier this term in United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2025, 6:30 am
In Part I, I revisit the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Youngstown Steel v. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 8:27 am
Kaufmann, a federal district court’s ruling that the “no aid” provision in Missouri’s constitution did not violate the Equal Protection Clause and served a “compelling state interest” in “maintaining a very high wall between church and state. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Accordingly, assuming, without deciding, that Senator Skelos presently has standing to sue the Governor, we now proceed to the merits (see Matter of New York State Assn. of Criminal Defense Lawyers v Kaye, 96 NY2d 512, 516 [2001]; Babigian v Wachtler, 69 NY2d 1012, 1013 [1987]; Matter of Roman Catholic Diocese of Albany v New York State Dept. of Health, 66 NY2d 948, 951 [1985]). [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 9:42 am
United States, 529 U.S. 848, 857 (2000) (quoting United States ex rel. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
But courts have also identified a need to protect states’ authority and interests by limiting removal to situations in which a federal defense is applicable, hence, an additional requirement for removal. [read post]
28 Nov 2006, 7:02 am
., v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 4:30 am
Ryan v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 3:24 pm
In one decision, Mattel, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 1:06 pm
The effect of the lies and bullying, and the strain on the community is evidenced by the recent settlement in the matter of Borough of Harvey Cedars v. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 9:01 pm
And 21 states have passed their own RFRAs. [read post]
8 Sep 2021, 4:00 am
Canada (Minister of Finance), 2002 SCC 41 by Justice McVeigh in Fraser v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 7:39 pm
United States (2002). [read post]
