Search for: "Petition of United States" Results 5981 - 6000 of 23,977
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2012, 12:00 pm
Duruji arrived in the United States on a student visa in 1982 to attend Ohio Dominican University. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 11:30 am by Jim Pravel
The TTAB granted the petition, and the owner appealed to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, which overturned the cancellation on two grounds. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 9:50 am by Jason C. Gavejian
Today, in a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court of the United States held in Campbell-Ewald Co. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 5:00 am
In my first blog in this series, I explained that there are multiple causes to our immigration dilemma here in the United States. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 10:20 pm by Kali Borkoski
On Wednesday, the Court will hear oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2008, 11:29 pm
There's something curious about the United States' position in Munaf v. [read post]
12 May 2009, 2:23 am
(Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing)Supreme Court of the United States.CASSENS TRANSPORT COMPANY, Crawford & Company, and Dr. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 3:14 pm by Thomas McAvity
After its review of DOMA, the Central District court concludes that it violates the equal protection rights of petitioners under the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution. [read post]
9 Mar 2008, 4:20 pm
United States (07-330), Kennedy v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 9:05 pm by JP Sarmiento
CASE: Marriage-Based Adjustment of Status CLIENT: Filipina LOCATION: Hartford, CT Our client came to the United States in 2004 with an H-4 visa from the Philippines. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 1:18 pm by JP Sarmiento
CASE: Marriage-Based Adjustment of Status CLIENT: Indian LOCATION: Cincinnati, OH Our client came to the United States in January 2008 with a B-2 visitor visa from India. [read post]
21 May 2008, 11:42 am
However, as we set forth in our answer to the petition for review, we believe the opinion simply applies the principles set by the United States Supreme Court in Campbell v. [read post]