Search for: "State v. Chance" Results 5981 - 6000 of 10,799
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2011, 2:50 pm
Today, the Court issued an important ruling in favor of Skinner and others like him who seek nothing more than a chance to use modern DNA testing to prove their longstanding claims of innocence.At issue in the case, Skinner v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 7:56 am
a chance to make comments by email here so that the Office can decide whether to take a position on it.For the record, Article 27 states: "The date of filing of a Community trade mark application shall be the date on which documents containing the information specified in Article 26(1) [= application details + request for grant + fee] are filed with the Office by the applicant or, if the application has been filed with the central office of a Member State or with the… [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 4:08 am by SHG
E.g., United States v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 4:00 am by David Bilinsky
On May 12, 2022 the British Columbia Court of Appeal issued reasons in the case of: Trial Lawyers Association of British Columbia v. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 1:08 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  My piece never went anywhere, but I’ll take my chance to share it now, modified to add some discussion of The Knockoff Economy, which I think is equally worth reading. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 12:48 am by Joseph Fishkin
Yesterday’s blockbuster student loan decision in Biden v. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 4:16 am by Edith Roberts
” At LAWnLinguistics, Neal Goldfarb parses the statutory language at issue in Husted v. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 7:10 pm by Barry Eagar
One or more words that might reasonably be required by a competitor to describe similar goods/service cannot be such a badge.I'm going to be lazy here and simply paste in the relevant section of Clark Equipment Co v Registrar of Trade Marks [(1964) 111 CLR 51, in which Kitto J said:"In Registrar of Trade Marks v W. and G. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 1:22 am
I didn't want to comment on it until I got the chance to read the complaint. [read post]
14 May 2015, 7:29 am by Tim Sitzmann
In the Board’s 2012 decision of Research in Motion Ltd. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 11:40 am by Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A.
The plaintiffs’ claim was dismissed with prejudice, forcing them to appeal to the state supreme court for any chance of recovery from their claim. [read post]