Search for: "State v. Country" Results 5981 - 6000 of 26,698
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
In Part One of this series, I explained why last week’s opinions in Chiafalo v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:00 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
In 1970, (Republican) President Nixon signed Title X into law, which led to the creation of federally funded family-planning clinics across the country. [read post]
The Court further held that EU Member State data protection authorities are required to suspend or prohibit personal data transfers where the SCCs cannot be complied with in the recipient country and the data exporter has not already ended the personal data transfers. 3. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:02 pm by Daphne Keller
But courts do the interpreting under the court order standard, so diversity of state laws is not the issue.) [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 12:58 pm by Peter Margulies
These economic gains are realized not only by destination countries but also by sending countries. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 12:30 pm by Christian Schröder
This obligation does not only apply to data transfers into the United States but to all countries located outside the European Union. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 10:02 am by Rob Robinson
Schrems claims that the United States does not offer sufficient protection of data transferred to that country. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:17 am by INFORRM
The destination state may, for example, have an ‘adequacy decision’ that means that the state in question ensures an adequate (roughly equivalent) level of protection to the ensured by the GDPR (Article 45 GDPR). [read post]
”  (para. 134) The Schrems II judgment will require many EU data controllers to reassess, and in some cases adapt, the mechanisms they use to transfer data internationally, not just to the United States but potentially to other foreign countries as well. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
Usually the Fifth Circuit is given credit for creating the exception in 1972, in McClure v. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 6:13 pm by Jeanne Huang
Along with the rise of legal positivism, international law became perceived as the body of law dealing with external aspects of States or, in other words, with relationships between States. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 1:56 pm by Unknown
United States (Endangered Species Act; Yellowstone Grizzlies)Dossett v. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 10:07 am by Christian Schröder
Now, probably more than ever, a particular focus should be put on the data exporter’s evaluation of the legal developments in the recipient state. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 7:51 am by Mark Wortman
Out-of-State Enforcement Sometimes, a parent violates a custody order by moving a child out of the state. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Sales tax rates, hiked in the preceding years, came down—but the Nutmeg State’s property taxes remain among the highest in the country. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm by Guest Opinion
 The ultimate goal is to bend the curve of foodborne illness in this country by reducing the number of illnesses. [read post]