Search for: "State v. Still" Results 5981 - 6000 of 44,317
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2017, 4:26 am by Jon Hyman
When a judicial opinion starts out with a quote such as this, it’s usually not a good sign for the defendant, unless you happen to be the United Auto Workers, the defendant in Phillips v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 10:09 am by Eric Goldman
This case also brought to mind the sad saga of DC v RR, a case that I still view as one of the most troubling cases I’ve blogged in my 15 years of blogging. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 9:00 pm by DONALD SCARINCI
She will, however, still participate in the cases by reading the briefs and transcripts of oral arguments. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 1:14 am
ARCHAIC DEATH MACHINERY ABOLISHED ---- For immediate releaseACLU Nebraska and Nebraskans Against the Death Penalty heralded theNebraska Supreme Court's opinion issued today in State v. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 9:10 am
The study of pro se defendants (post earlier today) reminds me of a recent Washington case where the defendant who chose to represent himself lost on appeal, forced to live with the consequences of his waiver of counsel: State v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 10:19 am by Bruce Nye
  State and Federal law still differ, however, with respect to the “indirect purchaser” rule. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 6:29 pm by Sonia Katyal
This week, my colleague, Jeanne Fromer, and myself had the pleasure of hosting a Tri-State conference on Intellectual Property at Fordham Law School. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 4:06 pm by Josh Blackman
[I'm still not over by Chief Justice Roberts's discussion of direct taxes. ] Nearly twelve years later, I still haven't gotten over NFIB v. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
This post concerns the Opinion of the Advocate General in Case C-362/14: Schrems v. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 12:32 pm
McKesson Corp., 573 F.Supp.2d 431 (Aug. 26, 2008), the District Court for the District of Massachusetts dismissed a national class action antitrust complaint, borrowing from the recent United States Supreme Court decisions in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]