Search for: "State v. Holder"
Results 6001 - 6020
of 7,211
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2018, 2:37 am
”The case is Rentmeester v Nike Inc, 9th U.S. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 6:23 am
In Facebook v. [read post]
22 Oct 2016, 3:26 am
Copinger (17th ed), [22-18], p 1626, n 94 cites the Hong Kong case of Hksar v Chan Nai Mang (2005), in which it was held that the meaning of “affect prejudicially” was wide in scope and not necessarily restricted to economic prejudice, although that was the obvious area at which the section was directed. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 9:43 pm
Lucasfilms v Ainsworth [2009] EWCA Civ 1328, and on appeal to the Supreme Court). [read post]
5 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
The staff stated then that these are treated as vesting on the regular vesting schedule (unless the holder has actually retired). [read post]
16 May 2011, 9:21 pm
Commercial loss in France can include loss resulting from sales of infringing goods, loss based on the volume of sales by infringer or profits which the IP holder would have realized had they themselves made the sale. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 7:25 am
One hopes that, 55 years after Brown v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 7:39 am
The editorial board of the Los Angeles Times expresses disappointment with the Court’s “inconsistent” rulings in First Amendment cases, arguing that in Holder v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 3:22 pm
See id.; see also Intersport, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 12:31 pm
In 2005, MGM v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 3:50 pm
The first case, Biden v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 10:33 am
In Shelby County v. [read post]
30 Aug 2009, 6:15 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: UK government revives downloader cut-off proposal; ISPs object (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) (1709 Copyright Blog) (TorrentFreak) (Ars Technica) CAFC grants Microsoft expedited patent appeal in Word case; Microsoft submits opening brief in appeal: i4i Ltd v Microsoft Corp (IP Watchdog) (Patently-O) (Patently-O) (Washington State… [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 3:17 am
§1322(a)(2), unless the holder of the claim agrees to different treatment. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 2:53 am
Until now, the abortion law being practiced in the United States is the Roe v. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 7:02 pm
Co. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 8:25 am
” Couture v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 1:25 pm
§1322(a)(2), unless the holder of the claim agrees to different treatment. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 3:17 am
§1322(a)(2), unless the holder of the claim agrees to different treatment. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 7:24 am
” See United States v. [read post]
