Search for: "State v. Mark"
Results 6001 - 6020
of 19,223
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2016, 11:55 am
Related Cases: Jewel v. [read post]
16 Nov 2021, 10:07 am
"] From Nunes v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 11:42 am
In Garcia v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 10:15 am
The majority in State v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 9:58 pm
Hawaii Attorney General's press release: "I am pleased that the United States Supreme Court has granted certiorari in this important case," Attorney General Mark Bennett said. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 8:22 am
" (internal quotation marks omitted)); United States v. [read post]
23 May 2007, 6:03 am
Consequently, Argument 1 missed the mark. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 10:19 am
This week’s conference marks the theoretical “cutoff” for grants that could be argued this term without expedited briefing. [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:37 am
In the Anheuser-Busch case, the importation from the USA of bottled beer under the BUDWEISER mark for use and sale in US military and diplomatic establishments within the UK did not entitle the plaintiff to establish what Lord Oliver later stated was the first element of a passing off claim. [read post]
28 May 2024, 6:00 am
Decided on May 1, 2024 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department ANGELA G. [read post]
28 May 2024, 6:00 am
Decided on May 1, 2024 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department ANGELA G. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 7:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 8:01 am
The Monday opinion in United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 1:25 pm
In the recent decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB), Central Garden & Pet Company v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 2:06 pm
In Matal v. [read post]
21 Jul 2012, 2:52 am
While the Supreme Court held that a state could not put a retarded person to death in Atkins v. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 3:28 am
CARY PRESS,;No 06-CV-6686 (JFB) (ARL);UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK;2009 U.S. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 6:43 am
The IPKat can’t quite remember…) A pretty picture Well, happily, now the IPKat has had a chance to peruse, read (and mark and inwardly digest, if not quite yet learn) both documents, and so now, dear readers, he is happy to tell you about the Lilly v JAI case. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:38 pm
App. 496, 506 (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 4:52 am
In a case involving a whiskey bottle dog toy with important findings for retailers and brand protection, the Supreme Court vacated the Ninth Circuit’s rulings on trademark infringement and trademark dilution in Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
