Search for: "Strong v. United States"
Results 6001 - 6020
of 6,661
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2010, 12:24 am
The United States, for instance, has disputed against disclosure in commercial matters, affirming the existence of a “strong and vital interest” in protecting confidentiality in that case. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm
United States) prohibits such blanket interception. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 9:32 am
See Leisek v. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 10:54 pm
Supply, Inc v. [read post]
25 May 2009, 1:37 am
[single citation] In a 2004 decision (SOCAN v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 10:58 am
There seems a very strong case that Part A ameliorates an important instance of disproportionality in the guidelines. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 7:06 am
Most notably, he served for more than a year as lead technology consultant to the major tobacco companies in United States of America v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 11:47 am
Corop. v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 9:00 am
Google changes trade mark policy: lets advertisers buy rivals’ trade marks as keywords in 194 countries (Out-Law) (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) Google and the value of brand advertising (IP finance) Nokia and iPhone; strong, famous and hip? [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 12:13 pm
Smith v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 7:35 am
Smith v. [read post]
9 Sep 2024, 1:25 pm
Finally, Plaintiff also fears threats from the public given the general rise of antisemitic incidents in the United States and, more specifically, the public attention the issue of antisemitism on college campuses has received. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 6:12 am
For example, in Dymow v. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 5:56 am
When Corporations Are the Criminalizers Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris have promoted private-sector investment in Central America on the theory that it will improve standards of living and stem the flow of migrants to the United States. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 11:10 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
23 May 2023, 7:00 am
In Sipko v. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 3:58 pm
And given the ostensible justification -- stated fears of trying these particular defendants on American soil -- the changes would undermine the authority and legitimacy of all federal courts in the United States.? [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 5:30 am
Today, the federal system and virtually all states allow VISs in the United States. [read post]
27 May 2011, 11:00 am
U.S. v Averette (1970) significantly changed its applicability, as the Court of Military Appeals decided that the UCMJ only applied to civilians in times of formally declared war. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 8:16 am
For example, in DeHoog v. [read post]
