Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE" Results 6021 - 6040 of 7,360
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2010, 6:31 am by Andrew Dickinson
In February this year, the English courts appeared finally to have woken up to the arrival of the Rome II Regulation, with the first published decision addressing its provisions. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 6:32 pm by Lisa McElroy
Not surprisingly, my Plain English inbox was filled this week with questions about   Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 5:05 am
The second context is where a State-owned entity with separate legal personality is the signatory and it is sought to bind the State to the arbitration agreement. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 4:53 am
In a recent decision of the UK Supreme Court, a similar view appears to have been taken in the context of enforcement of awards: Dallah Real Estate v. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 8:53 am by Christopher Bird
Each week at Wise Law Blog, we review decisions from the Ontario Court of Appeal.R. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 4:21 am by INFORRM
  These are all areas in which the present English law of libel falls down. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 5:21 am by charonqc
In this view I was supported by the comments of Judge Newman in the case of DPP-v-Avery (2001) who stated that ‘the wearing of a mask can be a potent means of demonstrating in a lawful manner. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 4:01 am by sally
(On the application of) v Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change & Anor [2010] EWHC 2752 (Admin) (02 November 2010) Source: www.bailii.org [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 3:29 am
In Clinton David Jacobs v Motor Insurance Bureau [2010] EWCA Civ 1208, the Court of Appeal held that where a person is injured by an uninsured driver and is entitled to recover from the Motor Insurers Bureau (MIB), that person is entitled to recover damages assessed according to English law, rather than the law where the accident occurred.The appellant, Mr Jacobs (a resident of the UK) was seriously injured when struck by a car while holidaying in Spain. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 5:29 pm by INFORRM
  He relied on the English decision in Woodward v Hutchins ([1977] 1 WLR 760). [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 11:45 am by John Morris
Supreme Court in the “violent video game” case, Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 9:44 am by Lyle Denniston
If there was one strategic error by counsel in Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 11:13 am by Sheppard Mullin
 While this proposition has seldom been addressed, the 1997 ruling in English v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 11:13 am by Sheppard Mullin
 While this proposition has seldom been addressed, the 1997 ruling in English v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 6:55 am by Lisa McElroy
Many Plain English readers will be interested in the case of Skinner v. [read post]