Search for: "In INTEREST OF FEW v. State" Results 6021 - 6040 of 11,576
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2016, 4:00 am by Barbara S. Mishkin
Mishkin The constitutionality of the CFPB’s structure was front and center at this past Tuesday’s oral argument in PHH Corporation et al. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 10:40 am
I have a column that appears today on FindLaw, discussing the Supreme Court's recent decision in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
27 Oct 2018, 7:52 am by INFORRM
But what interests me is whether it is right that no legal action can be brought against him for his decision to wilfully thwart the administration of justice. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 8:20 am by Patricia Salkin
At this stage, the court could not determine as a matter of law that this claimed differential treatment was rationally related to a legitimate state interest. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
On September 28, in the case of Hoffer v. [read post]
15 Dec 2024, 7:18 am by Eleonora Rosati
Such a consideration also brings to mind the ‘RUSSIAN WARSHIP, GO F**K YOURSELF’ case, which the General Court decided a few days ago [IPKat here]. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 5:01 am
United States, 521 U.S. 898, 117 S.Ct. 2365, 138 L.Ed.2d 914 (1997), and New York v. [read post]
16 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The Supreme Court upheld an essentially identical state law in the 1965 case of Cox v. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 11:48 am by Kyle Persaud
A few years later, the Supreme Court held that any state or local law, that is against the Constitution, is void, and a court could strike down a state or municipal law as unconstitutional. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 2:58 pm by NL
I’m very interested to hear more about this challenge if anybody knows details.The other challenge that springs to mind is based upon Burnip v Birmingham CC, Trengove v Walsall MBC, and Gorry v Wiltshire C [2012] EWCA Civ 629 (Our report here). [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
The challenge reached the state’s highest court, the New York Court of Appeals, which issued a strangely reasoned opinion, People v. [read post]