Search for: "Long v. United States" Results 6021 - 6040 of 20,251
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2018, 9:06 am by Cortney Lollar
United States is the interpretation of a restitution statute applied in tens of thousands of criminal sentencing hearings each year. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 8:37 am
(See Upjohn Co. v United States, 449 U.S. 383, 389 (1981)For communications to be regarded as privileged, they must be treated as privileged. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 2:14 pm by Andrew Hamm
United States 20-1594Issue: Whether the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act’s felony prohibitions on “dispensing” drugs reach the administering of drugs by practitioners, which has been left to state and local regulation for more than a century. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 7:46 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Thus, so long as the written description of the Parent Application “reasonably conveys to those skilled in the art,” see Ariad Pharms., Inc. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 8:46 am by Ryke Longest
The United States argues for the special master’s disgorgement remedy Assistant to the Solicitor General Ann O’Connell argued on behalf of the United States in support of the special master’s Report. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 4:06 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
United States (Federal Recognition) State Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2020.htmlWalter v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:11 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix Chambers.
On Wednesday 7 March 2012 the Supreme Court will hand down judgment in the following: PP (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, W (Algeria) and BB (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Z (Algeria), G (Algeria),U (Algeria) and Y (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
“Country of concern” means any foreign government that has engaged in a long-term pattern or serious instances of conduct significantly adverse to the national security of the United States and poses a significant risk of exploiting bulk sensitive personal data or United States Government-related data to the detriment of the national security of the United States. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 3:10 pm by Andrew Crocker
EFF’s Long History of Trying to Stop NSA Spying in the Courts EFF first sued over the tapping into AT&T’s fiber optic cables in 2006 in a case called Hepting v. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
Judge Mariani also noted that the United States Supreme Court has long held that Plaintiffs may limit their claims in order to avoid federal subject matter jurisdiction. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 9:48 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The due process clause of the United States Constitution is only a few words long. [read post]