Search for: "New v. New" Results 6021 - 6040 of 166,026
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
17 Dec 2022, 7:48 am by Kalvis Golde
New York was “so unimportant and insignificant” as to be harmless under Chapman v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 2:52 pm by Jeremy
This website examines high profile disputes such as Joyce v Morrissey. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 3:33 am
Provided for your review/use is this week's update of key industry news, views, and events highlighting key electronic discovery related stories, developments, and announcements. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 10:17 am
The Court also noted the NZ Supreme Court decision in R v Dixon [2015] NZSC 147 [see here], holding that digital CCTV footage was both a ‘document’ and ‘property’ under the NZ Crimes Act 1961. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 3:47 am
And, as the gTLD Applicant Guidebook (v. 2012-06-04) Module 4 notes, “there is a possibility that significant funding will accrue to ICANN as a result of one or more auctions”. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 5:00 am by Ted Folkman
Litig., 618 F.Supp.2d 335 (S.D.N.Y. 2009), and Schindler Elevator Corp. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 5:00 am by Ted Folkman
Litig., 618 F.Supp.2d 335 (S.D.N.Y. 2009), and Schindler Elevator Corp. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 3:45 pm
Adam Welle has written Campaign Counterspeech: A New Strategy to Control Sham Issue Advocacy in the Wake of FEC v. [read post]
6 Sep 2006, 5:02 pm
For those who use the Epstein-Markell-Ponoroff casebook, or another book that teaches New Headley Tobacco Warehouse Co. v. [read post]