Search for: "People v. Part" Results 6021 - 6040 of 25,292
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Sep 2011, 4:49 pm by NL
A personal status did not need to be immutable or innate (Clift v the United Kingdom no 7205/07 July 2010 and A, and Others v the United Kingdom [GC] no 3455/05 ECHR 2009). 5. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 4:49 pm by NL
A personal status did not need to be immutable or innate (Clift v the United Kingdom no 7205/07 July 2010 and A, and Others v the United Kingdom [GC] no 3455/05 ECHR 2009). 5. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:51 pm by Ilya Somin
The files don't reveal any anticipation of the reaction Kelo would generate, on the part of any of the justices. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
On this kind of picture, progressive constitutional development—the living part of living constitutionalism (or living originali [read post]
19 Feb 2025, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 12:36 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Effects of past chronic stress on explorative v. exploitative thinking—when people experience the world as harsh and unfair, people stick to what they know rather than exploring new options. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 1:39 am by Lucy Hayes, Olswang LLP
SSUK also passed on the names of two people who contacted them about volunteering, who then travelled to France and did a day’s work on the Steve Irwin. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 8:51 am by Jim Martin
I am a part-time legal reference librarian with the Law Library. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 3:36 pm
"    This is the very same nonsensical victim-blaming rhetoric  the Supreme Court used more than a hundred years ago in  Plessy v. [read post]
7 Jun 2008, 10:19 am
At issue in No. 06-1005, United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2015, 4:24 pm by INFORRM
Data Protection The Information Commissioner has accused the government of “letting people down” on nuisance calls. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 5:18 am by SHG
  And they are still angry about it.It's reminiscent of the controversy that arose when the Supreme Court decided Board of Regents v. [read post]