Search for: "State v. Means"
Results 6021 - 6040
of 61,304
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2011, 1:35 pm
Simpson, 2008 SCC 40, and Grant v. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 2:25 am
This is what she writes:Defamation v Freedom of Expression: The ECHR Grand Chamber Hands Down Judgment in Delfi v EstoniaOn 16 July 2015, the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) handed down its much-awaited judgment in Delfi AS v Estonia. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 3:54 am
Interpreting contract language Local 589 v Cuevas, 271 AD2d 535 Using clear and unambiguous language in a collective bargaining agreement makes it easier for a court to resolve the meaning of a Taylor Law contract provision. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 12:49 pm
In Allegheny Reproductive Health Center v. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 7:57 am
For the agreement:https://www.eff.org/document/lagleva-v-doyle-settlment-agreement For more on this case:https://www.eff.org/cases/lagleva-v-marin Contact: press@aclunc.org [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 3:31 pm
Yovich v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 3:30 pm
Photo by Andrea Piacquadio on Pexels.comOn June 30, 2020, the United States Supreme Court, in an opinion authored by Justice Ginsburg in “United States Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 12:21 pm
Big banks challenge a Washington state surtax on Washington-based bank income Washington Bankers Association v. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 6:51 pm
” The opinion notes that United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 8:33 pm
This has been a hot topic in the EU for quite some time now, especially following the publication of Coty Germany GmbH v Parfümerie Akzente GmbH, Case C-230/16. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 4:00 am
Freshour v. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 8:00 am
" District of Columbia v. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 3:09 am
The IPKat's informant fills the gap as follows:"In its judgment of 28 January 2010, the Brussels court of appeal has referred questions to the ECJ in the framework of the appeal in Sabam v Tiscali (which was well reported at the time it was issued in 2007; an English translation is available here). [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 6:11 pm
Beattie v. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 6:42 am
”) State v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 6:36 am
State Law Claims. [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 8:30 am
This means that general safety and administrative concerns are not enough for the State to win the case. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 2:00 pm
” Potter v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 2:27 pm
Today’s Supreme Court decision in National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 7:59 am
As discussed here, on May 18, 2011, the California Intermediate Court of Appeal held in the Luther v. [read post]
