Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 6021 - 6040
of 13,838
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2011, 3:57 pm
In Wollmer v. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 7:38 am
United States likely did with the legislative repeal of DADT. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:46 am
United States, concluding that he “still think[s] the government’s surplusage argument is pretty silly, but I’m no longer so sure the government’s reading creates an absurd amount of surplusage. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 5:46 am
California, supra. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 8:21 am
United States, 11-7328; Parker v. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 5:17 pm
Phelps, the funeral-protest case, and United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 7:41 am
Dora Lane In Gordon v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 6:00 am
After graduating as the valedictorian of her class, Lutie returned to her university to teach law in 1897 and became the first woman in the United States to teach at a chartered law school. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 10:57 pm
In Truly Nolen of America v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 4:29 am
Finally, JURIST’s Jaclyn Belczyk covers Thursday’s decision in United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 4:43 am
United States, in which a man who pleaded guilty to possessing child pornography is challenging his ten-year sentence enhancement based on a prior state conviction. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 10:30 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 10:32 am
United States — duty of federal prosecutors to prove the interstate-commerce connection of a charge under the Hobbs Act Halo Electronics v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 9:33 am
Doe and Doe v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 9:33 am
Doe and Doe v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 5:38 am
” Here is the abstract: In Lyng v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 3:30 am
Supreme Court took up the case of United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 3:13 pm
While the Supreme Court in the case of United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2013, 10:12 am
Louisiana State Police Department, 2013 U.S. [read post]
11 May 2017, 5:30 am
***Next week, I'll summarize the Ninth Circuit's important decision in United States v. [read post]
