Search for: "Little v State" Results 6041 - 6060 of 26,854
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2019, 7:55 am by John Elwood
But with a little explanation, both seem straightforward and important. [read post]
15 May 2019, 7:21 pm
And the state, either as the traditionally conceived apex of political order, or as the repository of large aggregations of power within an international state system, now serves as a (but not the) nexus point for the regulatory power of technique. [read post]
15 May 2019, 2:09 pm by Dan Ernst
Paul Horwitz, University of Alabama School of Law, has posted A Close Reading of Barnette, in Honor of Vincent Blasi, which appears in the FIU Law Review 13 (2019): 689-728:This article, written for a symposium marking the 75th anniversary of West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
Less familiar is a problem that is perhaps the obverse: plural and incompatible ways of generating claims to say “yes,” to give the final word on who shall rule and what the state shall do. [read post]
15 May 2019, 4:39 am by SHG
Absent mandatory language in the regs, or court decisions like Doe v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 4:30 am by John Gotaskie
  The Appeals Court specifically stated that tests employed for vicarious liability in tort cases have “little to do” with wage cases and directed the District Court to ignore them. [read post]
14 May 2019, 9:27 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Panel One: User-generated Content, Digital Labor, and Collaborative AuthorshipModerator: Bethany RabeRebecca Tushnet: Fanworks, Fair Use, and Self-Actualization Through Transformative ExpressionTitle assigned a few months ago is a little misleading because I actually wanted to take the opportunity to talk about the Copyright Office’s recent report on moral rights, though I’m happy to talk about anything fanwork related during the panel discussion and Q&A. [read post]
14 May 2019, 7:29 am by Andrew Hamm
Nixon doubled down on the Southern Strategy during the general election, capturing six southern states compared to one for Democrat Hubert Humphrey. [read post]
14 May 2019, 6:56 am by Richard M. Re
As a result, many have assumed that Hall represented little more than a relic of an older view of state prerogatives. [read post]
14 May 2019, 3:22 am by SHG
Hall, which held that an individual could sue a state in the courts of a different state. [read post]
13 May 2019, 12:11 pm by Eugene Volokh
Madison, 1 Cranch 137, 176–180 (1803); intergovernmental tax immunity, McCulloch, 4 Wheat., at 435–436; executive privilege, United States v. [read post]
13 May 2019, 4:06 am by Edith Roberts
At CNN, Joan Biskupic explains that “[w]hat happens in [June Medical Services v. [read post]
12 May 2019, 10:10 am by Jack Pringle
"South Carolina Supreme Court: Web-Based Emails Are Not "Backup"In 2012, the South Carolina Supreme Court, in Jennings v. [read post]