Search for: "The United States, Petitioner"
Results 6041 - 6060
of 8,963
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2012, 6:00 am
Islamic Republic of Iran US DC Cir (Filed 02/28/2012) McKesson, a United States company, claimed that after the Islamic Revolution, the government of Iran expropriated McKesson’s interest in an Iranian dairy (Pak Dairy) and withheld its dividend payments. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 4:51 am
Kneedler, arguing for the United States, was permitted to address several other arguments in support of petitioners’ position. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 4:51 am
Kneedler, arguing for the United States, was permitted to address several other arguments in support of petitioners’ position. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 1:31 pm
The other alternative, advanced by Assistant to the Solicitor General Eric Feigin on behalf of the United States, would produce what Justice Scalia described as an “absolutely weird” theory of administrative review in which the MSPB, despite lacking jurisdiction over a facial constitutional challenge to a statutory employment bar, is nevertheless responsible for fact-finding, with plenary “appellate” review by the Federal Circuit. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 6:30 am
The editorial board of the New York Times discusses the Montana campaign finance case as an example of “how the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision has upended important state campaign spending laws. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 9:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 8:25 am
Ken Feinberg, speaking at a symposium on mass torts, asks what legal challenges do mass torts confront in the federal courts. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 6:51 am
Politifact.com evaluates a claim by presidential candidate Rick Santorum that Justice Ginsburg “prefers” the South African constitution to the United States Constitution; it concludes that “Santorum’s take on Ginsburg’s comments twisted a handful of words to mean something they did not. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 9:27 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 8:26 pm
Support for Petitioners' Arguments on Corporate Liability Petitioners were supported by the United States, appearing as amicus curiae. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 5:27 pm
-China trade relations and keep the United States on the defensive in bilateral negotiations. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 1:30 pm
United States Army Corps of Engineers, et al. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 1:27 pm
United States Army Corps of Engineers, et al. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 12:05 pm
Kennedy said: “Suppose an American corporation commits human trafficking with U.S. citizens in the United States. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 10:31 am
In Castillo v Ochoa, 2012 WL 523696 (D.Nev.) petitioner, Jose Manuel Garza-Castillo sought the return of his child from the United States to Mexico, pursuant to the Convention. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 7:30 am
Petitioner received a response from the United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Indian Affairs stating that “there is not a federally recognized Alleganian tribe. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 6:32 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog, serves as counsel to the petitioners in Mohamad, but the author of this post is not involved in the case.] [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 6:12 pm
In the Washington Post, former Bush Administration State Department Legal Advisor John Bellinger, argues that ATS lawsuits are being used to harass corporations into settlements, to interfere with other nation’s domestic affairs, and to embroil the United States in disputes with important foreign allies like the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, and Germany. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 11:43 am
In this case, the United States is on the other side. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 8:23 am
Radu argued that his ex-wife, respondent Petruta Toader, wrongfully moved L.R. from Romania to the United States in violation of Radu's "rights of custody" under the Hague Convention. [read post]
