Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 6061 - 6080
of 7,360
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Oct 2010, 8:47 pm
Here’s a very brief summary: In a long line of cases (such as Presbyterian Church in the United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 12:32 pm
(October 18, 2010) "The United States Supreme Court on October 6, 2010, heard oral argument in Connick v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 2:18 am
Those looking for a clear statement that pre-nuptial agreements are akin to contracts in English law will be disappointed. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 4:01 am
This is only the third case in which such a finding has been made – the other two are Pfeifer v Austria (2007) 48 EHRR 175 and Petrina v Romania Judgment of 14 October 2008). [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 10:29 am
The fact that a steel-rollered Evolution machine, so long as it remains steel-rollered, does not infringe and is capable of lawful use as a complete machine in that state is irrelevant. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 8:59 am
At Wednesday’s oral argument in Kasten v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 2:12 am
Rather it appears to be a toll-free number in the United States. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 1:04 pm
This understanding (which might have been incorrect as a matter of English law) was adopted by the American Framers, and carried forward by antebellum state courts. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 4:42 am
s PR consultant had, incorrectly, stated that P2 did not know P1 this was an unauthorised statement which had been corrected within 3 days [19]. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 4:07 am
Reference was made to the well known English case of Thomas v Newsgroup Newspapers Ltd [2001] EWCA Civ 1233. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 10:10 am
How could I have slogged through Pennoyer v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 12:02 am
The Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human rights yesterday heard the conjoined applications in Von Hannover v Germany and Springer v Germany. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 4:35 am
His Lordship applied the principle established in Freeport v Arnoldson [2007] E.C.R. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 5:14 pm
On 12 October 2010 the Fourth Section of the Court of Human Rights, presided over by English judge Sir Nicholas Bratza, gave judgment in the Article 10 case of Saaristo v Finland. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 3:31 pm
., the largest law firm in Fairbanks, Alaska with 8 attorneys.Years of Paralegal Experience: 10Education/Degrees: BA, History/English and AAS, Legal AssistingSpecialty Areas: Civil litigation, workers compensation, family law, debt collectionCareer Highlight: Which one to pick? [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 9:37 am
C.A.); Newby v. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 9:34 am
In the recent case of Innes v. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 5:02 am
One noteable feature of last week's oral argument in Snyder v. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 2:51 am
This gap of 446 days between libel jury trials seems to be the longest in English legal history (the trial in Bryce v Barber listed for 26 July 2010 having, in the event, been tried by a judge alone). [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 9:59 pm
The case is Bruce McCandless v. [read post]
