Search for: "People v. Mays"
Results 6061 - 6080
of 39,685
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2025, 9:53 pm
DeJoy and Kennedy v. [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 5:11 pm
See People v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 2:50 am
"This is an action for legal malpractice arising from the defendant' s representation of the plaintiff in the action entitled People a/the State a/New York v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 4:05 am
”Accordingly, the Appellate Division ruled that the hearing officer’s determination that Toolasprashad’s failure to appear “was without good cause” lacked the requisite proof, citing People ex rel. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 11:00 am
In its decision, the EEOC substantially relied upon the Supreme Court’s reasoning in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
13 May 2013, 5:14 am
For example, one file on the Western Digital hard drive was created on May 11, 2009, at 1:48 p.m. and was last accessed on August 13, 2009, at 7:30 p.m. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
The key divide may not be between White people and people of color. [read post]
25 May 2010, 3:10 pm
In fact, the instructions’ reference to “outrageousness” invited them to consider all the factors that can make speech outrageous, and to many people that may well include the viewpoint that the speech expresses. [read post]
30 May 2012, 5:00 pm
You may recall that the case, Gill v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 10:14 pm
Ashland Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 8:30 am
From U.S. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:23 pm
Sassenberg v. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 6:04 am
The Court says allegations of prior misconduct may qualify as as legitimate impeachment material.The case is People v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 5:58 pm
People v. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 11:21 am
In People v. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 11:47 am
People, Supreme Court Case No. 10SC460, the Court held that: "[L]aw enforcement officials may testify about their perception of a witness's credibility during an investigative interview. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 3:36 pm
And in considering those claims, the fact that the companies are for-profit enterprises, or corporations, may well be relevant, whether or not they are determinative threshold considerations. 5. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 6:30 am
[FN1] This misapplication is of relatively recent vintage, however, and may be traced to two Supreme Court decisions a year apart, Sony Corp. of America, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 6:43 pm
People v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:31 am
An irrational truism of social justice is that, since all people are equal going in, all people should be equal coming out. [read post]
