Search for: "President v. State" Results 6061 - 6080 of 21,135
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2014, 9:42 am by Paul Horwitz
, I think, very intriguing take on the use of animus in United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2009, 4:22 pm
The dissenting opinion states, "Instead, the CCAs will have to resort to the procedures invented by United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 5:36 am
Unfortunately, this narrative of "Adams, the Non-Partisan," caused the show to omit what was, indirectly, his long-lasting legacy: The appointment of John Marshall (prominently featured as Adams's second Secretary of State) as Chief Justice and, as his term ended, the appointment of the "Midnight Judges," which together led to Marbury v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
In Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 3:35 am by Sander van Rijnswou
Can you ask the members of a board it they have been a deputy of the vice president? [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 3:50 am
A State Supreme Court justice ruled that Harnett’s grievance had to be submitted to arbitration.The Appellate Division reversed, rejecting Local 1817’s argument that Harnett was covered by the collective bargaining agreement as a result of a settlement entered into by Harnett and the president of Rockland Community College. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 3:05 pm by Stephen Wiegand
On March 29, 2019, Alaska Federal District Court Judge Sharon Gleason granted summary judgment in favor of plaintiff environmental groups in League of Conservation Voters v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 3:05 pm by Stephen Wiegand
On March 29, 2019, Alaska Federal District Court Judge Sharon Gleason granted summary judgment in favor of plaintiff environmental groups in League of Conservation Voters v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 11:30 am by Mark Graber
Hubley Ashton and Maxwell Evarts, who argued United States v. [read post]
15 May 2007, 4:48 am
"Most importantly: Can anyone think of any historical examples where the Department of Justice told the White House that a course of conduct would be unlawful (in this case, a felony), and the President went ahead and did it anyway, without overruling DOJ's legal conclusion? [read post]