Search for: "United States v. Mark" Results 6061 - 6080 of 10,394
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2022, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
The documents included two Extremism Analysis Unit Home Office reports and a Counter Terrorism Policing report. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 1:00 am
, (Ars Technica), (Patent Prospector), (Washington State Patent Law Blog), (IP Law Observer), (PLI), (PLI), (IP Updates), (Patent Docs), (Peter Zura’s 271 Patent Blog), (The Invent Blog), (IP Spotlight), (Just a Patent Examiner), (Techdirt), (Patent Baristas), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (Patently-O), (IAM), (IP ThinkTank), (Against Monopoly), (Against Monopoly), (IP Law360), (Hal Wegner), (Ladas & Parry), Global Global - General Virtual monopoly – four strategic… [read post]
18 Nov 2020, 8:57 am by John Elwood
United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 11:48 am by Mark Walsh
United States, which limits the scope of identity theft under a federal criminal statute. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 5:59 am by @travelblawg
MacLean landed a victory for himself and the public when the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) ruled yesterday that he should have been protected under federal law and not fired for leaking information about Transportation Security Agency (TSA) plans to reduce Federal Air Marshal (FAM) covered flights, a move he believed would endanger the public in a time of higher terror threats (Summer 2003). [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 1:39 am by Matrix Law
Lifestyle Equities C.V. and another v Ahmed and another, heard 20th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard 8th March 2023 Secretary of State for Transport v… [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 6:06 pm by Marie Louise
(Patently-O) District Court E D Pennsylvania: References to patents in website’s “terms of use” and online product manuals do not constitute false marking: Hollander v. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
The Protocol allows the highest national courts of Member States to pose questions to the Court on the interpretation and application of Convention rights in pending cases. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 6:00 pm
(IP Osgoode) US Trade Marks & Domain Names – Decisions 9th Circuit remands cybersquatting case to Western District: Lahoti v Vericheck (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 2:55 am
(Spicy IP)   Italy Blocked Pirate Bay users flock to other torrent sites (TorrentFreak)   Poland Three arrested as police swoop on Rapidshare Link forum (TorrentFreak) Football fans play with lawyers – trade mark protection and critical website koniecpzpn.pl (end of Polish Football Association) (Class 46)   Russia Huge Russian BitTorrent site has domain suspended (TorrentFreak)   Sweden New anti-piracy task force set to pressure file-sharers (TorrentFreak) Illicit… [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 3:00 am
Amazon.com (Washington State Patent Law Blog)   US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Activision - Patent Compliance Group files qui tam action against Activision (Patent Arcade) Google - Inside Google’s first patent trial: Function Media, L.L.C. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 2:55 am
(Spicy IP)   Italy Blocked Pirate Bay users flock to other torrent sites (TorrentFreak)   Poland Three arrested as police swoop on Rapidshare Link forum (TorrentFreak) Football fans play with lawyers – trade mark protection and critical website koniecpzpn.pl (end of Polish Football Association) (Class 46)   Russia Huge Russian BitTorrent site has domain suspended (TorrentFreak)   Sweden New anti-piracy task force set to pressure file-sharers (TorrentFreak) Illicit… [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 3:00 am
Amazon.com (Washington State Patent Law Blog)   US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Activision - Patent Compliance Group files qui tam action against Activision (Patent Arcade) Google - Inside Google’s first patent trial: Function Media, L.L.C. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:11 pm by Brett Trout
” Given the Lanham Act’s prohibition on registering immoral and scandalous matter, the examiner at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) rejected Brunetti’s application for registration, as did the USPTO’s Trade-mark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB). [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:11 pm by Brett Trout
” Given the Lanham Act’s prohibition on registering immoral and scandalous matter, the examiner at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) rejected Brunetti’s application for registration, as did the USPTO’s Trade-mark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB). [read post]