Search for: "A----. B v. C----. D"
Results 6081 - 6100
of 10,369
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2014, 5:40 pm
La solicitud de extradición deberá estar acompañada de:(a) documentos que describan la identidad y, si es posible, la nacionalidad de la persona requerida y su ubicación;(b) una exposición de los hechos del caso;(c) el texto de las leyes que describan los elementos constitutivos y la tipificación del (los) delito (s) y la sanción correspondiente;(d) el texto de las leyes relativas a la prescripción de la… [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 7:38 am
Canal Co. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 5:41 pm
b. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 10:43 am
Thirdly, clauses 4(3)(b) & (d) would relieve courts of the cl.4(1) obligation to give great weight to the importance of freedom of speech in cases relating to alleged breaches of confidence where the duty of confidentiality was said to arise from a contract – including, it would seem, in the employment context, non-disclosure agreements (‘NDAs’), which have been criticised as being against the public interest (see ABC v Telegraph Group Ltd [2019] EMLR… [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 1:10 pm
Here is the provision:Fair and equitable66.501 The Board shall fix royalty and levy rates and any related terms and conditions under this Act that are fair and equitable, in consideration of(a) what would have been agreed upon between a willing buyer and a willing seller acting in a competitive market with all relevant information, at arm’s length and free of external constraints;(b) the public interest;(c) any regulation made under subsection 66.91(1);… [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 1:46 pm
§ 3553(d)(4)(B); DFARS 215.506-70. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 2:00 pm
Supreme Court will hear arguments in South Dakota v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
GINSBURG, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which KENNEDY, J., joined, and in which SCALIA, J., joined except as to Parts III and V–B–1.Note the additional shades of grey added by the Kagan + Alito concurrence and the partial reservation of Scalia's concurrence with Ginsburg and Kennedy.Court watchers will immediately note that this alignment has nothing to do with traditional “liberal” v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
GINSBURG, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which KENNEDY, J., joined, and in which SCALIA, J., joined except as to Parts III and V–B–1.Note the additional shades of grey added by the Kagan + Alito concurrence and the partial reservation of Scalia's concurrence with Ginsburg and Kennedy.Court watchers will immediately note that this alignment has nothing to do with traditional “liberal” v. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 8:56 am
(d) AFP v. [read post]
24 Jul 2021, 11:51 am
Comment b to Section 433A circuitously and vacuously defines “distinct harms” as those “results which, by their nature, are more capable of apportionment. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 3:54 pm
The Illinois Supreme Court held, in Heck v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 1:24 pm
Ltd v. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 9:56 am
MVP HEALTH, INC., Appellee. 1st District.Administrative law -- Agency for Health Care Administration -- Revocation of assisted living facility licenses, denial of licensure renewal applications, and imposition of administrative fines -- Claims against licensee were not proven where only evidence to support claims was uncorroborated hearsay -- Claim that licensee operated another assisted living facility without obtaining a valid license or qualifying for a license exemption was not proven where… [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 6:09 pm
Si el formulario se entrega personalmente, ya que la búsqueda del expediente no se puede realizar de inmediato, se le pide al solicitante que dé un número de teléfono al cual se le pueda llamar, con cargos revertidos, para indicarle los aranceles que debe cancelar. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 5:28 am
Huyett, Jeffrey D. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 3:00 am
The Board reviewed the non-exclusive factors set forth in Section 43(c)(2)(B) of the Lanham Act, and answered the question in the affirmative.As discussed in the Section 2(d) analysis, the Board found a high degree of similarity between the marks. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 2:38 am
In Ajay Industrial Corpn. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 8:20 am
Cordis Corp., 2009 WL 3851314, *4 (D. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 11:20 am
AbortionKF228.R59 H85 2010Roe v. [read post]
