Search for: "People v Justice A."
Results 6081 - 6100
of 23,060
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2021, 10:31 pm
Now, if he did insist on presiding over a third Oracle v. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 1:08 pm
During his campaign for the presidency, then-candidate Donald Trump announced that he would appoint justices to the Supreme Court who would overturn Roe v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 3:37 am
And we learn that criminal cases are not the only ones which tend to be recycled through the justice system. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 7:51 am
Two years later, in McDonald v. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 12:34 pm
(Justice Amy Coney Barrett is recused from this case.) [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 2:20 pm
The case, People v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 7:34 am
Check the Dillon v. [read post]
4 Sep 2006, 7:38 am
Bronx D.A. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 3:59 am
’” At Jost on Justice, Kenneth Jost weighs in on last week’s oral argument in on Ayestas v. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 4:00 am
Florida and Sullivan v. [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 7:04 pm
And in both the court exercised its discretion to review the issue of prosecutorial misconduct in the interests of justice because it was not properly preserved.In the first, People v Gibson (2015 NY Slip Op 09722), the defendant appealed from a judgment of conviction for sexual abuse and other crimes. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 11:17 pm
For example, the famous US Supreme Court case of FTC v. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 4:08 am
Wayfair, in which the justices will reconsider a ruling that limits the ability of state governments to require out-of-state online retailers to collect tax on sales to state residents, arguing that “[i]f states can directly compel people who live outside state boundaries to adhere to state standards—standards the people had no chance to influence—the concept of statehood itself is undermined. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 12:34 am
In State v. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 11:56 am
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg made a thinly veiled speech about the backlash to Roe v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 2:29 pm
” That’s the first line from Justice Kennedy’s plurality opinion in United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 9:23 am
Co. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 4:33 am
People v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 8:34 am
Those cases where there is either a fundamental matter of law, an issue that impacts a great many people or a case of tremendous importance for the administration of justice. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 8:34 am
Those cases where there is either a fundamental matter of law, an issue that impacts a great many people or a case of tremendous importance for the administration of justice. [read post]
