Search for: "Small v. People" Results 6081 - 6100 of 8,519
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2012, 12:00 am by INFORRM
The only available guidance derives from DPP v Collins ([2006] UKHL 40), an appeal from the Divisional Court. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:31 pm
* The IPKat thanks Daniel Gallagher (Mayer Brown International LLP) for picking up a small but significant error in the original version of this post. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 6:40 am by Lisa R. Pruitt
As journalist Carlos Alcala observes, it reads something like a Declaration of Independence:We the People of the County of El Dorado, California, have the right to produce, process, sell, purchase and consume local foods, thus promoting self-reliance, the preservation of family farms and local food traditions.Indeed, "freedom v. oppression" was a theme among the 20 or so pro-ordinance speakers at the meeting. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 5:08 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
  It’s a good system in my humble opinion, one that ensures far more people and small businesses have access to justice, instead of restricting our courts to the wealthiest corporations and individuals who can afford to pay the tens of thousands of dollars a month minimum (not to mention the retainer) charged by most patent infringement lawyers. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 7:55 am
  But on the long list of To-Dos, after buy more Cheddar Bunnies, most people do not have “File baby’s name as a trade mark with the USPTO”. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 10:47 pm by Lara
  The court acknowledged that Peters opted-out of the Lockabey v Honda Class action suit in San Diego Superior Court enabling her to seek redress in small claims court. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 11:53 am by Staci Zaretsky
Folks coming into law school now have much better information than people who enrolled a few years ago, but people are continuing to enroll based on misleading information, and they continue to have massive debt. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 2:59 am by war
Needless to say, there are quite a few “other” points in Rares J’s 115 paragraphs: Singtel Optus Pty Ltd v National Rugby League Investments Pty Ltd (No 2) [2012] FCA 34 For a more recent “no volitional act, therefore no infringement” case in the USA see Prof Goldman’s ‘Photobucket Qualifies for the 512(c) Safe Harbor (Again)–Wolk v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 4:24 pm by Bridget Crawford
Each work in progress will be commented upon by a senior scholar as well as other scholars in a small, supportive working session. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 10:06 am by Molly Wilson
  Even legal case books contain examples; who can forget the famous tort case, Eckert v. [read post]