Search for: "The United States, Petitioner"
Results 6081 - 6100
of 8,963
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2012, 3:43 pm
Petitioners, submitting reports by experts, have pointed to the various factual and legal circumstances that impede obtaining such compensation in court proceedings outside of the United States. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 5:40 am
United States, 507 U.S. 234, 242 (1993)). [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 6:33 pm
According to a New York Probate Lawyer, the mother who made the Will was born a French citizen in 1899, and she became a naturalized United States citizen. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 9:13 am
Supreme Court, it is not going to be at the margins by attempting to distinguish Citizens United (which is what the state supreme court attempted to do) or by debating how the law affects these particular petitioners. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:49 pm
Supreme Court, it is not going to be at the margins by attempting to distinguish Citizens United (which is what the state supreme court attempted to do) or by debating how the law affects these particular petitioners. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 3:34 pm
" Furthermore, the disclosure must be provided to the payee by "first class and certified mail, return receipt requested or United States postal service priority mail. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 1:43 pm
Subsidies The United States is accustomed to accusing other governments of subsidizing industries exporting to the United States in violation of world trade rules. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 11:53 am
The most interesting thing likely to come of the case is the possibility that it will advance the Court’s continuing effort to confine and explain its 2001 decision in United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 10:23 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 3:00 am
Instead the Supreme Court held that Section 10(b) reaches frauds only where “the purchase or sale is made in the United States, or involves a security listed on a domestic exchange” (see our dozen plus postings concerning this seminal decision and cases decided since; search under “Morrison” in the Search box of this blog). [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 11:38 am
Criminal law -- Aliens -- Reentry into United States after removal or deportation -- Government is collaterally estopped from litigating alienage where jury's verdict of acquittal in prior federal criminal trial for illegal reentry was necessarily based on jury's reasonable doubt about defendant's alienage and fact of alienage status is an essential element of current prosecution for illegal reentry -- Because government is collaterally estopped from arguing… [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 10:52 am
Measures such as the Stop Illegal Steel Trade Act of 1999 would have violated the United States' international obligations, encouraged retaliation by U.S. trading partners, forced American consumers to pay higher prices for everyday necessities, and harmed millions of workers in steel-using industries — workers who outnumbered U.S. steelworkers by 40-to-1. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 2:45 pm
---------------US CONSULATE GENERAL, HYDERABAD, INDIADATEI, _____________ born on _____________ in _____________ state that:I have read and understand the Wilberforce pamphlet.The petitioner is _____________The petitioner supervisor is _____________ with a principle location of _____________The number of petitioner employees at the work site is_____________My primary work location is _____________The end-client for my work is _____________The end-client… [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 6:58 am
Gallagher, scheduled for oral argument on February 29, has been dismissed by the petitioners with the consent of the respondents. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 5:11 pm
United States, No. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 3:51 pm
All of the securities have been sold by the temporary administrator and the proceeds have been invested in bonds of the United States, the State and the City, all of which are held by the appointed person under the supervision of the U.S. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 2:10 pm
A Montana Supreme Court’s decision upholding the state’s law prohibiting independent political expenditures by a corporation related to a candidate, in spite of Citizens United v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 1:19 pm
Since my previous post on the United States Supreme Court case of Maples v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 4:00 am
”14 The Court continued its analysis by stating that here, as in Eldred, there was simply no call for the heightened review that petitioners were seeking. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 3:38 am
In addition to being the prevailing party, to receive an award of reasonable litigation costs a taxpayer must have exhausted all administrative remedies, shows that the position of the United States is not "substantially justified," and must not have unreasonably protracted the court proceeding. [read post]
