Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 6081 - 6100
of 10,394
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2013, 4:26 pm
” Id. at 1533 (Kagan, J., dissenting); accord Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae Supporting Affirmance, Genesis Healthcare Corp. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 11:33 am
On September 20, 2013, Counsyl, Inc. filed a declaratory judgment complaint in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California against Myriad Genetics, Inc. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 10:01 am
” United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 6:44 pm
* * * “In Furman v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 6:01 am
UBS Puerto Rico Fixed Income Fund V, Inc. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 6:00 am
UBS Puerto Rico Fixed Income Fund V, Inc. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 5:59 am
UBS Puerto Rico Fixed Income Fund V, Inc. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 5:58 am
UBS Puerto Rico Fixed Income Fund V, Inc. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 3:57 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 3:01 pm
UK decision actually states in full [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 2:52 pm
Cir. 2010), in which this court construed “‘the centrifugal unit’” to be the entire unit. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 8:07 pm
Institutional Architecture of Law and Governance: The United States and Law Making--The States and the People; Popular referendums. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 3:43 pm
The decision is one of the first Circuit Court decisions to address punitive damages availability in a Jones Act or unseaworthiness action since the Supreme Court of the United States’ land mark decision in Atlantic Soundings v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 2:39 pm
For example, Lee cites Justice Grier's dissent in O'Reilly v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 11:17 am
The focus of the case is location – and, what is meant by an "offer to sell . . . within the United States" under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
5 Oct 2013, 7:00 am
United States. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 1:16 pm
Circuit erred in invalidating an EPA rule that implemented limits on cross-state air pollution, and Schuette v. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 5:57 am
Yesterday, the Court of Justice of the European Union delivered its judgment in Pinckney v. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 5:16 am
See United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 4:03 am
Hermilo Tamez Salazar, 108 USPQ2d 1063 (TTAB 2013) [precedential].Applicant Salazar admitted in his interrogatory answers, and in a declaration filed with the Board, that he had not used the subject mark on any product sold in the United States and had not shipped any product into the United States. [read post]
