Search for: "State v. Chance" Results 6101 - 6120 of 12,117
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2014, 1:52 am
Entitled "The Protection of Corporate Reputations", it's led by Martin Howe QC(8 New Square) and Justin Rushbrooke QC (5RB), who will consider the current state of the law for protecting corporate reputations. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 10:46 am
Today the United States Supreme Court ruled in POM Wonderful v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 9:58 am by Jeremy Malcolm
The United Kingdom had the chance to accomplish something like that in this year's round of reforms to the Copyright Act, some of which took effect on 1 June. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  He was joined by Arthur Sutherland, who represented the losing party in Nebbia v. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 7:53 pm by Schachtman
The trial court, alas, erred in stating the relevant statistical concepts. [read post]
7 Jun 2014, 5:38 am by Charles (Chuck) Rubin
    The recent jury verdict in the Zwerner case in Miami, Florida (U.S. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 2:52 pm by Lyle Denniston
As other judges have done in nullifying same-sex marriage bans, Judge Crabb relied in prt upon the Supreme Court’s U.S. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 10:50 am by Lyle Denniston
The constitutional dispute over same-sex marriage in Utah is the furthest along in the federal courts of all of the cases on that issue since the Supreme Court’s United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 8:50 am by Andrew Delaney
Supreme Court set up a procedure in Anders v. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 6:27 am by Joy Waltemath
The dissenting judge suggested that the manual’s permissive language regarding progressive discipline did not show an unequivocal intent to bind the city to just-cause employment (Freeze v City of Decherd, Tennessee, June 4, 2014, Sargus, D). [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 7:42 am by Amy Howe
  The resolution has no realistic chance of generating a constitutional amendment. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 5:25 am by Amy Howe
Commentators continue to discuss Monday’s decision in Bond v. [read post]