Search for: "State v. Means" Results 6101 - 6120 of 61,309
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2024, 9:26 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
” An argument, that was implicitly endorsed by the Supreme Court in Adolph when it stated that having the individual PAGA claim in arbitration and the representative claim in state court satisfied this requirement. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 9:27 pm by Simon Gibbs
This means that the relevant test has to be one of competence, not excellence. [read post]
Entities exempted from the Act include (i) agencies, commissions, districts, etc. of the state or political subdivisions, (ii) nonprofits, (iii) higher education, (iv) national securities associations, (v) financial institutions or data subject to Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA), and (vi) hospitals as defined under Connecticut law. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 8:14 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Cyberheat CA Appeals Court: Claims Under State Spam Statute Not Preempted by CAN-SPAM – Hypertouch v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 10:12 am by John Elwood
 (2)  Whether United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 7:28 am by Erin Miller
United States No. 08-1322, Astrue v. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 7:26 am by Eric Goldman
A federal district court preliminarily enjoined Executive Order 13943 seeking to kick WeChat out of the United States. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 7:30 pm
(The other two cases are United States v. [read post]