Search for: "The United States, Petitioner"
Results 6101 - 6120
of 8,963
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2012, 7:39 am
The Court has not requested the views of the United States in Christopher. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 9:45 pm
The main opinion begins with the premise that the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution "protects people, not places. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 7:55 pm
A k1 visa holder can only adjust status on the basis of a marriage to the US citizen petitioner within 90 days of admission to the United States. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 10:29 am
The petitioners asked for a leave in court so that they can amend their complaints. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 9:15 am
The Democratic National Committee attempted to take some of the pressure off of broadcasters by releasing a letter stating, among other things, that "Mr. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 3:07 pm
And did we mention that the counsel of record for the petitioner is none other than Harvard lawprof Laurence Tribe? [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 3:01 pm
The Court stated this could have occurred if the “United States did not protect works from the country of origin at the time of publication; the United States did not protect sound recordings fixed before 1972; or the author had failed to comply with U.S. statutory formalities . . . [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 4:44 am
The government now argues: Petitioner is a military detainee at the United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 1:42 pm
Chairman Pearce and Members Becker and Hayes participated. *** Road Sprinkler Fitters, United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipe Fitting Industry of the United States and Canada, Local 669, AFL-CIO (21-CE-00374; 357 NLRB No. 176) Orange, CA, December 30, 2011. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 11:30 am
Dellinger, Partner, O'Melveny & Myers; former Acting Solicitor General of the United States (for Petitioner) Steven G. [read post]
Review of the Effects of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act on Third Party Participation Applicants
1 Feb 2012, 9:15 am
“New” Defense: Prior Commercial Use The United States has not traditionally had an express prior user defense or experimental user defense, but such defenses have effectively always been present. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 8:49 am
Anecdotal evidence suggests that the Central Reexamination Unit is still struggling with the new standard. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 8:17 am
The amendment provides the following: L-1 Filing Fee and Fraud Prevention and Detection Fee Will be Increased by $2,250 for Petitioners Employing 50 or More Employees in the United States and More Than 50% of the employees are H-1B or L-1 Employees H-1B Filing Fee and Fraud Prevention and Detection Fee Will be Increased by $2,000 for Petitioners Employing 50 or More Employees in the United States and… [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 7:34 am
In a Term in which the Court was not considering the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act, Texas’s redistricting plans, and Arizona’s controversial efforts to regulate immigration, the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 7:25 am
Williams is remarkably similar to a Second Circuit case I teach in Criminal Procedure, United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 1:03 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 5:09 pm
In that case, the Court of Appeals considered the following question on certification by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit: “Under District of Columbia law, does a petition sent to a federal government agency in the District provide a basis for establishing personal jurisdiction over the petitioner when the plaintiff has alleged that the petition fraudulently induced unwarranted government action against the plaintiff? [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 3:32 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 9:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 1:59 am
Labeling supporters, including Nature's Path Organic, say that GMO ingredients are found in 80 percent of packaged foods in the United States. [read post]
