Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 6101 - 6120
of 13,838
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Nov 2015, 11:58 am
United States — how a federal appeals court should treat an error by the trial judge in imposing the wrong sentence range under the federal Sentencing Guidelines Duncan v. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 7:05 am
Black, a former United States senator; William O. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 12:51 pm
In United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 7:00 am
Here is the petition in White v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 4:00 am
Windsor and Burwell v. [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 3:58 am
Co. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2015, 6:44 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 11:38 pm
Supreme Court case, United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 2:55 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 1:28 pm
Google Inc. case, which includes the text:On Wednesday [18 Nov 2015], a motion hearing was held in the San Francisco courthouse of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California to discuss Oracle's motion to disqualify the court-appointed damages expert, Dr. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 11:24 am
United States. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 9:02 am
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California conducted a two-week trial in June of 2014. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 9:02 pm
On Wednesday, a motion hearing was held in the San Francisco courthouse of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California to discuss Oracle's motion to disqualify the court-appointed damages expert, Dr. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 9:30 am
Now the law throughout the United States, California has recognized gay marriage since 2008 (though only by those married during the window before Proposition 8 was passed) and then again in 2013 when the US Supreme Court issued its opinion in Perry v Hollingsworth overturning the Proposition 8 prohibition. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 9:07 am
(Note: Public agencies are likely not subject to the California state laws at issue in the Apple case.) [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 9:07 am
(Note: Public agencies are likely not subject to the California state laws at issue in the Apple case.) [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 2:27 am
Further, the defendant distinguished this case from the similar case decided by the United States Supreme Court in 2014, Navarette v. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 9:01 pm
In his controlling opinion in the 1978 case of Regents of Univ. of California v. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 1:59 pm
United States (2012) and Hines v. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 9:51 am
In United States v. [read post]
