Search for: "United States v. Minor"
Results 6121 - 6140
of 7,104
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2016, 9:01 pm
This aligns with the well-settled law in the United States. [read post]
18 Oct 2022, 8:02 am
In sum, we can and should celebrate the many successes of the Clean Water Act and the fact that it has dramatically reduced water pollution levels in the United States. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 8:51 am
United States created a binding rule of precedent under the “narrowest grounds” doctrine of the Marks rule. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 3:25 am
Board of Education: the idea is that the Supreme Court supported Brown because it served the United States’ cold war agenda of supporting human rights. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 10:10 am
See United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 4:54 pm
Briefly, the Orthodox Jewish co-owners of unitS in a condominium set up succahs on their balconies, meant for their exclusive use, against the condominium’s bylaw in the declaration of co-ownership prohibiting constructions on the balconies. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 6:12 am
It Don't Mean A Thing If It Ain't Got That Swing On 06/28/10, the Supreme Court of the United States decided Bilski v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 6:41 am
The United States Code contains dozens of criminal conspiracy statutes. [read post]
9 May 2024, 11:30 am
Wade, Griswold v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm
Since the mid-1970s, he has been deeply pessimistic about the possibilities of political change: Political action of any sort, he believes, cannot improve or ameliorate the condition of black people in the United States. [read post]
15 May 2019, 6:00 am
Less familiar is a problem that is perhaps the obverse: plural and incompatible ways of generating claims to say “yes,” to give the final word on who shall rule and what the state shall do. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 9:06 am
The issues were: (1) whether ECHR Article 8 was engaged; (2) whether the SWP’s activities were “in accordance with the law”; and (3) whether the SWP’s activities were “necessary in a democratic society” in the interests of one of the objectives stated in Article 8(2), in accordance with the four-part test set out by the UK Supreme Court in Bank Mellat v Her Majesty’s Treasury (No 2) [2014] AC 700. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 8:07 am
CCPA’s sales restrictions raise First Amendment concerns In Sorrell v. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 5:01 am
In Rapp v. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 11:51 am
Fay claims that rates of drugs use over the past 40 years have fallen further in the United States than in Portugal. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:30 am
There is of course no general exception for speech to minors, including speech that depicts violence. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 12:18 pm
American Bush v. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 12:09 pm
A group not involved in Lyon v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 6:40 pm
In Rafaeli, LLC v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 7:38 am
At least in Germany, the largest European market, there is no eBay v. [read post]
