Search for: "Long v State"
Results 6141 - 6160
of 45,301
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2010, 5:23 pm
By: Doug Christensen and Chris Amundsen On June 17, 2010, a sharply divided United States Supreme Court resolved the case of New Process Steel LP v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 3:02 am
However, a case which took place in a neighboring state may not be proper to bring in NY. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 8:29 am
Co. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 4:05 am
United States v. [read post]
15 May 2009, 4:00 am
State v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 4:32 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2008, 3:53 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 4:04 am
Indiana, in which the court will decide whether the Eighth Amendment’s excessive fines clause applies to the states, and Culbertson v. [read post]
28 Oct 2021, 6:44 am
Mirvis, and Sabastian V. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 12:15 pm
United States and Ashcroft v. al-Kidd (used with permission, www.courtartist.com) How should citizens in a republic bound by the rule of law regard the pretextual use of law by state officials? [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 8:35 am
Today’s Long Island employment law blog discusses the decision reached in Kansas v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 7:48 pm
PSEG Long Island, LLC v Town of East Hampton, 2017 WL 4399106 (NYAD 2 Dept 10/4/2017)Filed under: Current Caselaw - New York, Preemption, Uncategorized [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 8:48 am
See United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 4:52 pm
Flood v. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 6:03 am
These laws were declared unconstitutional by the Indiana Supreme Court in the case of Tucker v. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 8:15 am
As EFF’s Jewel v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 4:00 am
The case of the day is Richmond Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 10:34 am
Co. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 12:22 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 10:35 am
The fact-finding hearing in The Queen (KN) v LB Barnet [2011] EWHC 2019 (Admin) was heard as long ago as July 2011 but it is worth underlining here as an example of the way the Administrative Court deals with age assessments in the light of the guidance given by the Supreme Court in A v Croydon. [read post]
