Search for: "President v. State"
Results 6141 - 6160
of 21,135
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2016, 3:21 am
Briefly: At the Sixth Amendment Center, David Carroll discusses Monday’s decision in United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 6:49 pm
" Ordinarily, courts decide for themselves what a statute means, after hearing from counsel on both sides; in the Libby case, Libby is on one side, the United States on the other; the President is not a party. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 1:46 am
Paterno, President Graham B. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 7:47 am
The State Department had argued that suits to enforce § 214 were not justiciable because they unreasonably interfered with the President’s authority to formulate U.S. policy regarding the status of Jerusalem, and thus presented a political question. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 1:05 pm
H.R.1 – originally named “The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017” and subsequently retitled to conform to Senate Budget rules as “An Act to provide for reconciliation pursuant to titles II and V of the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2018” – has passed the Congress and awaits the President’s signature. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 4:00 am
It has been a little over a year since the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in American Needle, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 9:30 am
A recent opinion from one of New York's State Supreme Courts, Aon Risk Services v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 4:51 am
Worst Offenders Want Better Treatment: A lawsuit, styled Bacote v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 7:11 am
This article grew out of an amicus brief we filed last year in NAMUDNO v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 7:19 am
In Packowski v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 6:35 am
At The New York Times, Adam Liptak reports that the grant – which came less than a week after the Court’s decision in another free-speech case, United States v. [read post]
12 May 2019, 9:01 pm
” Critics assert, in particular, that the president seems oblivious to a 1993 Supreme Court ruling, Nixon v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 9:03 am
James Boswell et al. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 9:03 am
James Boswell et al. v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 4:57 am
Rev. 1506 (2016) Download Article President Nixon’s Indian Law Legacy: A Counterstory Scholars of Federal Indian law have often celebrated President Richard Nixon for advancing tribal interests through legislation and policy initiatives. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 11:31 pm
’s position on the global stage than other candidates. [46] V. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 12:18 pm
In United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:20 am
Bommai v. [read post]
