Search for: "Rules for Court Reporters" Results 6141 - 6160 of 89,433
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2018, 8:38 pm by Howard Bashman
“Judge rules some stations can air ads attacking Arkansas Supreme Court justice hours after another judge blocks other broadcasters”: The Arkansas Democrat-Gazette has this report. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 1:38 pm
"Supreme Court won't tinker with ruling giving copyright to the Batmobile; The Batmobile is for Batman and Robin, unless you get a license from DC Comics": David Kravets of Ars Technica has this report. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 8:48 pm
" The Associated Press has a report that begins, "The judiciary in Washington is exempt from public disclosure requirements under the state's Public Records Act, the state Supreme Court ruled today, creating what a critic called a 'huge black hole' in government accountability. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 5:20 am by Gritsforbreakfast
“If courts are not enforcing the Rules of Professional Responsibility as they pertain to the conduct of defense attorneys and prosecutors, they are then responsible for what goes on in court,” he said. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 2:24 pm by firstamendmentblogger
., the New Jersey Supreme Court has ruled as follows: The primary issue in this case is whether criminal-conviction information, truthfully reported in campaign flyers,... [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 5:09 am by Immigration Prof
As previously reported on ImmigrationProf, the District Court after a trial ruled that Sheriff Joe Arpaio and the Maricopa County (Arizona) Sheriff's Office in the name... [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 2:46 pm by Malinda
So reports the Washington Times: The Arizona Supreme Court has ruled that a biological father can assert his paternity and challenge his child’s adoption though the father didn’t claim paternity by filing with a state registry. [read post]
22 May 2023, 12:14 pm by Immigration Prof
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in an opinion by Judge Sandra Ikuta ruled today that a Nevada federal... [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 8:40 am by Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
As reported on Hunton Andrews Kurth’s Privacy & Information Security Law Blog on January 25, 2019, the Illinois Supreme Court ruled that an allegation of “actual injury or adverse effect” is not required to establish standing to sue under the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 3:11 am by Gilles Cuniberti
Related posts:A New Mandatory Rule in the French Law of Torts The French Supreme Court for private and criminal matters (Cour... [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 7:20 am by Elizabeth Cummins, Esq.
The Third Circuit ruled the lower court abused its discretion in granting the injunction. [read post]
12 May 2009, 10:59 pm
All About Information reports that the Ontario Superior Court of Justice has ruled that a teacher had no expectation of privacy in information stored on his work laptop. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 8:05 am
In early news coverage, The Associated Press reports that "Court voids law aimed at animal cruelty videos. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 1:35 pm
This is not a barrister deliberately flouting the road traffic legislation or riding en route to the Court of Appeal to ask the judges to rule in his favour after his failed application to injunct Islington Council. [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 7:10 am by Emelina Perez
[JURIST] Egypt's Supreme Constitutional Court [official website] on Sunday ruled part of an election law unconstitutional, possibly delaying [AP report] the upcoming parliamentary elections. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 2:50 pm
"Court to rehear Massey case": The West Virginia Record provides a report that begins, "In a unanimous vote Thursday, the Justices of the state's Supreme Court of Appeals decided to reconsider their ruling in a controversial case. [read post]