Search for: "True v. United States"
Results 6141 - 6160
of 9,191
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
This may not be true of 42 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 4:08 pm
United States The Panopticon blog reports on the argument in the US Supreme Court case of Spokeo Inc v Thomas Robins, a case which concerns the issue as to whether there should be compensation for “digital injury” where there is no financial loss. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 6:42 am
On May 2, 2008, the Director of Security for FPL advised United States Secret Service agents `that an individual, without authorization, accessed the `GEXA Energy' . . . system in Houston. . . . [read post]
29 May 2016, 5:20 am
Yet, his decision in United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 7:06 am
Its focus is on preserving the Union (i.e. the United States, seen as a union of states), with slavery treated as a subordinate consideration. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 7:06 am
Its focus is on preserving the Union (i.e. the United States, seen as a union of states), with slavery treated as a subordinate consideration. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 2:07 pm
Cooley, General Principles of Constitutional Law 271 (2d ed. 1891) (discussing the implicit right to train with weapons)); United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 2:01 pm
General Assembly (A/72/162) (the 2017 WG Report) sought to unpacks the concept of access to effective remedies under the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations “Protect, Respect and Remedy” Framework. [read post]
20 Feb 2025, 6:45 am
United States—a case with a cert petition currently pending before the Supreme Court. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 6:27 am
Paragraphs 7-10 of the Complaint say Madsen, Dougherty, Hillman and Grives (i) are “United States citizen[s] and resident[s] of the State of California” and (ii) were, at “all times relevant” to the claims in the Complaint, “supervisory employee[s] of . . . [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 8:32 am
Serbia and Croatia v. [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 9:02 pm
Yet, we have no idea whether either of these claims is true. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 8:09 am
There shouldn’t be uncovered states and covered states; there should be the United States. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 1:05 pm
It provides a shield for individuals from arbitrary state action. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
As it turns out, neither proposition is true. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 5:39 am
§ 411(a), which provides that `no civil action for infringement of the copyright in any United States work shall be instituted until preregistration or registration of the copyright claim has been made in accordance with this title. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 3:09 am
Let me suggest, however, that the Department of Justice, and then the United States Supreme Court, explicitly refused to place the CRA into a genuinely transformative framework. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 5:14 am
United States, the federal government may not compel state governments or state officials to implement a federal program. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 7:30 am
President Clinton on numerous occasions averred that the United States was not at war. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 8:52 am
It is true that the retention of the applicants' private data cannot be equated with the voicing of suspicions. [read post]
