Search for: "Doe v. Superior Court" Results 6161 - 6180 of 8,636
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Aug 2011, 3:35 pm by Eugene Volokh
How are courts to do the obviously mushy Pickering balance?. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
[When ruling on class certification,] the court does not look at the parties' evidence under a shifting burden of proof. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 8:01 pm by The Legal Blog
Till then there is no appeal in the eye of law before the superior court. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 7:51 am
Superior Court (1982) 31 Cal.3d 785, 792 [a defendant may be liable for punitive damages if it acts with a conscious disregard of the plaintiff's fights]; Lackner v. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 7:51 am by Moseley Collins
Superior Court (1982) 31 Cal.3d 785, 792 [a defendant may be liable for punitive damages if it acts with a conscious disregard of the plaintiff's fights]; Lackner v. [read post]
6 Aug 2011, 5:38 pm by INFORRM
Superior courts were less convinced that ABC v Lenah Game Meats was an invitation to develop the law in this way. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 11:59 am by Robert A. Epstein
Tibbrine, there's a law for that, which requires an applicant seeking a name change to file a verified Complaint in the Superior Court, with a sworn affidavit with certain required details. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 7:25 am by Matt Brown
Every county superior court I’ve appeared in does both. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 5:30 am
Gundlach, BC429385, California Superior Court, Los Angeles County. [read post]