Search for: "Long v. United States" Results 6161 - 6180 of 20,254
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2010, 11:20 am by Cathy Reno
The controversial Citizens United v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Last year, when the Supreme Court invalidated Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 11:17 am
Although the Meso Scale Diagnostics decision confirms, at least under Delaware law, the long-standing view of many practitioners that a reverse triangular merger does not result in an assignment by operation of law, it does not directly affect the contrary position taken by the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in SQL Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 1:46 pm by Erin Miller
The following essay, part of our Race and the Supreme Court program, is by Gail Heriot, a member of the United States Commission on Civil Rights and a professor of law at the University of San Diego. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 3:41 pm by Eugene Volokh
Accordingly, we need not address any issues regarding the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution.] [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 8:42 am by Ben Sheffner
In his original order, Judge Davis declined to reach the constitutional issues, citing United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 10:15 am by Alex Wohl
Guy on the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 8:36 am by WIMS
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions   <> NRDC v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 10:54 am
To recap briefly, the document was a secret court order issued under Section 215 of the Patriot Act directing Verizon to provide "on an ongoing daily basis" all call records for any call "wholly within the United States, including local telephone calls" and any call made "between the United States and abroad. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 6:01 am
This essay explores these issues through the lens of one of the most important international law cases in the United States in at least the last decade: Hamdan v. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 6:00 pm by Daniel Jin
Authors: Tristan Dollie, Imogen Wilson The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom in BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA [2022] UKSC 25[1] has ruled on the point at which company directors must have regard to the interests of creditors (the so-called “creditors’ interest duty”) as set out in section 172 of the Companies Act 2006[2] (the “2006 Act”). [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 9:10 pm
In my post lauding the Obama Administration for plainly stating, in its latest filing in the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA”) case, that “the United States does not believe that DOMA is rationally related to any legitimate government interests in procreation and child-rearing,” I predicted “eruption of the right-wing volcanos. [read post]