Search for: "People v Justice A."
Results 6161 - 6180
of 23,060
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2014, 11:44 am
And although the state post-conviction court, seeing the case as a “mockery of [its] promise to people who are in the criminal justice system that they will have an adequate defense,” initially granted Rudin relief, the Nevada Supreme Court reversed that court’s judgment, finding Rudin’s petition untimely and reinstating her criminal convictions. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 3:26 am
I'm confident that Justice Baltodano is right here, and it points out an interesting way to avoid arbitration that I hadn't considered before. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 1:41 pm
Facts that are relevant to the vast majority of the people who are reading this summary:(1) If you're paid a salary (as opposed to hourly), you don't get paid overtime/time-and-a-half. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 11:38 am
Convictions upheld.The Supreme Court wasn't kidding when it said that justice ain't perfect. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 3:31 pm
So bought one to fix up.That's a common story to people in many different income categories. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 9:44 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 9:15 pm
Our reports on the civil oral arguments of the Illinois Supreme Court's November term conclude with Poris v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 9:15 pm
Our reports on the civil oral arguments of the Illinois Supreme Court's November term conclude with Poris v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 3:17 am
In Byrd v. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 11:55 am
[US v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 6:00 pm
Only unlike his majority opinion in Stenberg v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm
” 395 U.S. at 447; see also Counterman v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm
That is, many of the people who are celebrating Quill’s demise are in favor of progressive taxation, which is to say that we believe that higher-income people should pay higher effective tax rates than lower-income people pay. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 9:32 pm
People v. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 6:10 pm
Circuit a few weeks ago or People v. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 5:42 am
Burwell, arguing that “by punting, stalling for time, taking a breather — whatever the justices thought they were doing back in May — the court gave the administration a chance to hit reset, a chance it was smart enough to take by asking its opponents finally to put their cards on the table and by inviting ordinary people to tell the world why the case matters. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 1:58 pm
” The case, Klaassen v. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 3:07 am
” Brady v. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 9:24 pm
(For law geeks, see Alabama Power Co. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 8:18 am
See DeJames v. [read post]
