Search for: "United States v. Minor" Results 6161 - 6180 of 7,104
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2011, 7:41 am by Darren O'Donovan
Now is it possible for the EU institutions to oversee an intergovernmental agreement pursued by a minority of States, supposedly not related to the EU Treaties? [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
First, religious liberty in the United States has never been absolute, but rather is hemmed in by the moral imperative to not harm others. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 3:10 pm by Rick Hills
Again, one need not accept such claims: The evidence linking Serrano v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 3:39 pm
Indeed, some were openly hostile to African Americans, and launched such progressive schemes as the wave of residential segregation laws that swept through the United States in the 1910s. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 9:30 am by Steven J. Tinnelly, Esq.
Secondly, the burden of regularly maintaining an AED (in accordance with all federal and state regulations) and trained personnel on-site was not minor or minimal, outweighing the need for same. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 12:00 am by Adam Wagner
There has been significant commentary and conjecture over the decision in R (Smith) v Secretary of State for Defence & Anor (see our post or read the judgment). [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 9:30 am by Steven J. Tinnelly, Esq.
Secondly, the burden of regularly maintaining an AED (in accordance with all federal and state regulations) and trained personnel on-site was not minor or minimal, outweighing the need for same. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 11:32 am by Joseph D. Kearney
Around the same time, the United States produced a plat that identified the (northern-more) area east of Michigan Avenue as “public ground for ever to remain vacant of buildings. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 5:31 am by Josh Blackman
(Imagine if the ICJ ordered the United States not to build a wall on the Southern border!) [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 11:00 pm by Chuck Cosson
  Humans are, the argument goes, simply too susceptible to conspiracy theories, and the media system too disintermediated.[22]  Thus a flat-out duty of candor enforced by information technology platforms could be prone to concentrating power that is abused against a minority, and equally prone t [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm by John Dean
We function through a government that provides total freedom for the minority to be heard, to dissent and to disagree, and to try to influence the collective thinking of the nation to make their minority view into a majority view. [read post]
3 May 2017, 2:30 am by Nicandro Iannacci
One major argument is the corporate critique, powerfully articulated by Justice John Paul Stevens in his lengthy dissent to the Court’s 2010 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]