Search for: "Will v. United States" Results 6161 - 6180 of 92,028
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2015, 5:17 pm
 She also adverted to Alice Corporation v CLS [noted on the IPKat here], to which the other speakers would later refer. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 8:12 am by Hilf & Hilf, PLC
 The doctrine of preemption is also supported by Michigan Court interpretation of the law (See Michigan Coalition for Responsible Gun Owners v. [read post]
4 Jul 2024, 1:41 pm by Josh Blackman
United States favorably cited Chief Justice Marshall's psuedonymic essay defending McCulloch v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 4:16 pm by Kiera Flynn
The petition of the day is: Title: Kappos v. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 8:05 am
In a 8-1 decision, the United States Supreme Court held in Rita v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 12:14 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The case is American Tradition Partnership, Inc., et al., v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 9:19 am by Stephen D. Rosenberg
Tussey v ABB, Inc., an excessive fee and revenue sharing case decided on the last day of March after a full trial before the United States District Court for the District of Western Missouri, is a remarkable decision, imposing extensive liability for acts involving the costs of and revenue sharing for a major plan, on the basis of extensive and detailed fact finding. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 9:19 am by Federalist Society
This case presented two questions regarding the power of bankruptcy courts: One, does Article III of the Constitution permit bankruptcy courts to exercise the judicial power of the United States on the basis of litigant consent--and if so, can consent be implied by litigant conduct? [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 9:19 am by Federalist Society
This case presented two questions regarding the power of bankruptcy courts: One, does Article III of the Constitution permit bankruptcy courts to exercise the judicial power of the United States on the basis of litigant consent--and if so, can consent be implied by litigant conduct? [read post]
14 Feb 2025, 4:06 am by Barry Sookman
In an important copyright decision released earlier this week, Circuit Judge Bibas (sitting by designation) in a United States District Court granted Thomson Reuters summary judgement victories by finding that its Westlaw headnotes and key number system were protected by copyright and that the uses of the headnotes to train a competitive legal research tool was not a fair use. [read post]