Search for: "Brooks v. Brooks"
Results 601 - 620
of 2,702
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2012, 7:49 pm
App. 2012) involved a general question of legal sufficiency in light of the recent case, Brooks v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 8:18 am
" LeBlanc v. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 11:20 am
In today’s case (Bell v. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 2:14 pm
This episode features the Ackley House, the subject of the well-known case Stambovsky v. [read post]
11 May 2016, 11:57 am
The case is Berens v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 9:36 am
Category: Land Use Opinions;Recent Decisions Body: Below are today's land use Appellate Court opinions: AC31617 - Mountain Brook Assn., Inc. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2024, 5:09 am
In cases involving claims against public entities in New York, adhering to procedural requirements is critical. [read post]
27 Dec 2024, 8:37 am
In a case involving claims of water contamination, the Supreme Court of Suffolk County faced the question of whether to grant a late notice of claim against a public entity. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 10:44 am
When a contract between two loan servicing corporations contained a drop-dead date specifying that it could not be extended past June 2018, the district court erred in granting one corporation an injunction that kept the contract in force past the drop-dead date. [read post]
11 Jun 2022, 11:31 am
From U.S. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 7:44 am
Michelle Davis won in State v. [read post]
1 Apr 2025, 5:01 am
From Thursday's decision by Magistrate Judge Alistair Newbern in Doe v. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 5:05 pm
On Tuesday (Day 76), the defence case of Rebekah Brooks’ former PA, Cheryl Carter, began. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 4:26 pm
The case, Halpert v. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 8:18 pm
Brooks v. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 8:56 am
On Monday, in Abbott v. [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 5:46 pm
In Carter v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 6:30 am
Kraemer, Sweatt v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 4:53 pm
Even assuming, arguendo, that the court advised defendant of the scheduled trial date and warned him that the trial would proceed in his absence if he failed to appear (see generally People v Parker, 57 NY2d 136, 141), we conclude that the court failed to inquire into defendant’s absence and to recite “on the record the facts and reasons it relied upon in determining that defendant’s absence was deliberate” (People v Brooks, 75 NY2d 898, 899, mot to amend… [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 4:53 pm
Even assuming, arguendo, that the court advised defendant of the scheduled trial date and warned him that the trial would proceed in his absence if he failed to appear (see generally People v Parker, 57 NY2d 136, 141), we conclude that the court failed to inquire into defendant’s absence and to recite “on the record the facts and reasons it relied upon in determining that defendant’s absence was deliberate” (People v Brooks, 75 NY2d 898, 899, mot to… [read post]
