Search for: "C. v. C."
Results 601 - 620
of 56,836
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2017, 8:45 am
ABSTRACT: Case C-623/15 P Toshiba v Commission EU:C:2017:21 The Court of Justice confirms... [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 2:00 am
Jon C. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 7:40 am
In Judulang v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 2:54 pm
To discuss the case, we have Orin Kerr, who is the Fred C. [read post]
8 May 2014, 2:54 pm
To discuss the case, we have Orin Kerr, who is the Fred C. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 4:06 am
Supreme Court rejected Martin’s petition, holding that it was well settled that in order to demonstrate entitlement to §207-c a claimant must prove a direct causal relationship between his or her job duties and the resulting illness or injury, citing Brunner v. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 11:28 am
Pix Credit hereGroovin' slow and easy, just takin' our timeWe ain't goin' nowhere, for baby I don't mindSo put your arms around mewe're gonna take a journey down to rhythm and bluesRidin' on a soul train, yeah baby just-a me and you (lyrics Soultrain, here)This post considers, quite briefly, reflections on several points that may weigh significantly on the way in which one approaches the inevitable and now unstoppable trend toward AI regulation production, and its… [read post]
7 May 2007, 10:10 am
Jarvis v. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 1:23 pm
Sequoia Orange Co. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2025, 2:45 pm
Si es víctima de un accidente de motocicleta en California, es comprensible que le preocupe cómo cubrir tus gastos médicos, la ... [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 9:01 am
In a surprising opinion, Mayo Clinic v. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 2:12 am
National employment policy justifies age bias Palacios de la Villa v Cortefiel Servicios SA Case C-411/05 “Although a domestic law providing for compulsory dismissal from employment at a set retirement age constituted direct discrimination on the ground of age, contrary to an EC directive, it was justified if it pursued a legitimate aim of national employment policy, such as distributing employment between generations, and if it was appropriate and necessary for that… [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 2:56 am
Auto 24 SARL v Jaguar Land Rover France SAS (Case C-158/11); [2012] WLR (D) 175 “It had to be possible to verify the precise content of ‘specified criteria’ upon which a quantitative selective distribution system in the motor vehicle sector was granted pursuant to article 1(1)(f) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1400/2002 of 31 July 2002 on the application of article 81(3) of the Treaty to categories of vertical agreements and concerted practices in the motor… [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 2:56 am
Auto 24 SARL v Jaguar Land Rover France SAS (Case C-158/11); [2012] WLR (D) 175 “It had to be possible to verify the precise content of ‘specified criteria’ upon which a quantitative selective distribution system in the motor vehicle sector was granted pursuant to article 1(1)(f) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1400/2002 of 31 July 2002 on the application of article 81(3) of the Treaty to categories of vertical agreements and concerted practices in the motor… [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 2:56 am
Auto 24 SARL v Jaguar Land Rover France SAS (Case C-158/11); [2012] WLR (D) 175 “It had to be possible to verify the precise content of ‘specified criteria’ upon which a quantitative selective distribution system in the motor vehicle sector was granted pursuant to article 1(1)(f) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1400/2002 of 31 July 2002 on the application of article 81(3) of the Treaty to categories of vertical agreements and concerted practices in the motor… [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 2:56 am
Auto 24 SARL v Jaguar Land Rover France SAS (Case C-158/11); [2012] WLR (D) 175 “It had to be possible to verify the precise content of ‘specified criteria’ upon which a quantitative selective distribution system in the motor vehicle sector was granted pursuant to article 1(1)(f) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1400/2002 of 31 July 2002 on the application of article 81(3) of the Treaty to categories of vertical agreements and concerted practices in the motor… [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 2:56 am
Auto 24 SARL v Jaguar Land Rover France SAS (Case C-158/11); [2012] WLR (D) 175 “It had to be possible to verify the precise content of ‘specified criteria’ upon which a quantitative selective distribution system in the motor vehicle sector was granted pursuant to article 1(1)(f) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1400/2002 of 31 July 2002 on the application of article 81(3) of the Treaty to categories of vertical agreements and concerted practices in the motor… [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 2:56 am
Auto 24 SARL v Jaguar Land Rover France SAS (Case C-158/11); [2012] WLR (D) 175 “It had to be possible to verify the precise content of ‘specified criteria’ upon which a quantitative selective distribution system in the motor vehicle sector was granted pursuant to article 1(1)(f) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1400/2002 of 31 July 2002 on the application of article 81(3) of the Treaty to categories of vertical agreements and concerted practices in the motor… [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 12:42 pm
If that is the case, Bill C-18 is already a disaster as the lost links and cancellation of existing deals mean that Bill C-18 may result in a net loss for the media sector. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 1:22 pm
Estate of Henry Joseph Darger v. [read post]
