Search for: "In Re Adoption of MAR"
Results 601 - 620
of 643
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2008, 5:31 pm
Mar. 21, 2003).Maryland: Miller v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 11:09 pm
Mar. 13, 2008), aff’d, 2008 WL 2031337 (Del. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 11:01 pm
In In re IAC/Interactive Corp., 2008 WL 2462767 (Del. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 7:27 am
Recently, however, the Fourth Circuit applied the test used in § 2254(d)(1) without expressly adopting it. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 7:11 pm
The vacated opinion [In re VW II] "appears to adopt a slightly lower threshold favoring the party moving for transfer. [read post]
30 May 2008, 4:35 pm
We're going by Florida law. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 6:08 pm
Judge Spector, observing the general rule that artificial entities cannot appear in court pro se, concludes that adoption of the U.S. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 10:03 am
Mar. 25, 2008) Judge: John D. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 8:07 pm
(Dan Barry, "A Boy the Bullies Love to Beat Up, Repeatedly", Mar. 24). [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 5:55 am
Mar. 12, 2008) (here's a link).As defense lawyers, we naturally don't much like where this came out.But we're not going to rant about the unfairness of the result in the case.No, no.Instead, for a change of pace, we're going to rant about theunfairness of the process that led to the result.The result was this: A Pennslyvania state-wide plaintiff class soughtto recover from Pfizer a refund of amounts paid to buy eitherNeurontin or its generic equivalent,… [read post]
23 Mar 2008, 10:51 pm
Mar. 17, 2008:Every malevolent touch by a prison guard does not give rise to a federal cause of action. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 11:08 pm
Although the Supreme Court has yet to define the precise conduct that is actionable under a breach of good faith, the Emerging Court held that the directors could be found to have violated their duty of good faith if they consciously and intentionally disregard their responsibilities, adopting a ‘we don't care about the risks' attitude concerning a material corporate decision. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 5:52 am
Mar. 10, 2008), decision available here. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 8:39 am
Reg. 14286 (FDA Mar. 16, 2000). [read post]
23 Feb 2008, 4:24 am
The U.S. patent office has issued initial rejections in the re-examination proceedings of all NTP patents in question. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 8:23 am
LEXIS 3982 (Jan. 18, 2008) (noting the split and asking for briefs, which are due February 2008); and In re: Welding Fume Prods. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 7:55 am
Well, imagine you're a federal agency. [read post]
24 Dec 2007, 3:24 pm
He said he feared that the FBI, whose computer technology record has been marred by expensive failures, could not guarantee the data's security. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 1:04 pm
Reg. 9826, 9829 (FDA Mar. 4, 1997)). [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 11:38 am
Mar. 5, 2007) (fraud claim "construed" as fraud on the FDA preempted). [read post]
